Ed's Going for Evolution's JUGULAR in Intelligent Design Court Case <---------------

Ed Conrad · medicine forum Guru Wannabe Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 102

<
<
For 25 years I’ve known something that millions upon millions of
people don’t know -- or can’t possibly comprehend.
<
That’s because they’ve been brainwashed by the "experts" with
the alphabet soup at the end of their names..
<
The plain, simple fact is that there isn’t a scintilla of physical
evidence backing up the Theory of Evolution, although members
of the Scientific Establishment maintain a wealth of such evidence
exists.
<
I know this for a fact because I’ve gone head-to-head and eyeball-
to-eyeball with some of the nation’s leading anthropologists as well
as paleontologists and so-called "respected" institutions such as the
Smithsonian and the University of California at Berkeley. I've found
they simply can't cope with their lack of physical evidence, so they
employ devious methods of keeping their erroneous theory alive.
<
As you all should know by now, I’ve discovered petrified mammalian
bones, teeth and even soft organs some human -- between anthracite
veins in Northeastern Pennsylvania.
<
And, since the "golden rule" of geology is that coal was formed during
the Carboniferous Period - some 280 million years ago - my specimens
provide the evidence that man and a variety of large land animals are
much, much older than evolution dictates.
<
Anthracite, I might add, is considered the oldest of the coals.
<
Many of the specimens I have discovered have undergone state-of-the
art scientific testing, ALL with positive results, despite what the
skeptics say.
<
They include favorable research by American Medical Laboratories in
Chantilly, Va., and by a top bone expert -- Dr. Jeremy Dahl -- then at
Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, and others..
<
They also include upwards of 16 CATscans, dental x-rays, infra-red
scans; scanning electronic microscopy (SEM), and microscopic
examination of the presence of Haversian canals (the tell-tale sign
of bone).
<
Yet, over these past 25 years, I have met with nothing but deceit,
deception, collusion and conspiracy by members of the Scientific
Establishmen who are as dishonest as the day is long, protecting
their vested interests..
<
They have long attempted to ridicule me and my physical evidence
since they realize my discoveries most seriously threaten their
erroneous paradigm.
<
I actually had caught some of these so-called prestigious scientists
and institutions tampering with - or fiddling with -- my evidence to
avoid admitting that I have what I say I have.
<
And this is why, with the current Intelligent Design vs. Evolution
court trial going on in Harrisburg, I have offered to present physical
evidence and testimony.
<
I am willing and able to speak the truth in no uncertain terms,
shaking up all of science as I do.
<
It’s no wonder, then, that I have submitted a per se (non-lawyer)
friend-of-the-court brief in Pennsylvania Middle District federal
court.
<
I have offered to submit undeniable physical evidence concerning the
sham of evolution. It would be based (1) on the evolutionists’ absence
of clear-cut undeniable physical evidence, and (2) on the petrified
human remains I’ve discovered between anthracite veins.
<
The court case is Kitzmiller, et al. against the Dover School Board.
pitting a group of parents against the Dover Area School District.
<
A year ago the Dover school board voted to require ninth-grade biology
teachers to tell students about "problems with Darwin's theory" and to
mention intelligent design as an alternative theory of evolution
<
Eight parents have sued the district in federal court, rejecting any
mention of intelligent design in the classroom.
<
The evolutionists have called to the witness stand biologists,
paleontologists, textbook writers and science historians among others
- all of them lying through their teeth as to the available of a
mountain of physical evidence proving the reality of evolution.
<
Truth is, their "evidence" would be dwarfed standing aside a molehill.
<
Still, the evolutionists are out en masse to prevent any mention of
Intelligent Design being allowed to be taught in America’s classrooms.
<
So far, the most honest and courageous person to take the stand has
been Michael Behe, a professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University in
Bethlehem.
<
He's a leading proponent of Intelligent Design and considered the
defense's star witness.
<
Behe accepts many parts of evolutionary theory. But he has constructed
his arguments in favor of Intelligent Design using scientific
principles.
<
Intelligent Design is science, he testified, because it "relies on the
physical observation of observable empirical facts."
<
Behe explained that Intelligent Design is merely the "purposeful
arrangement of parts … We can detect it when separate, interacting
components are ordered in such a way as to accomplish a function
beyond the individual components."
<
He argued that it’s reasonable to infer intelligent design when
something seems well designed
<
In Behe’s testimony, as in his book, "Darwin’s Black Box," he
emphasized that we can conclude something was designed without
knowing the identity of the designer.
<
In his book, Behe wrote that Intelligent Design should be ranked as
"one of the greatest achievements in the history of science," rivaling
"Newton and Einstein, Lavoisier and Schrodinger, Pasteur and Darwin."
<
The evidence of design is all around us, and any honest scientist
should embrace it, he concludes.
<
In my friend-of-the-court brief, I informed Judge John E. Jones III -
ironically, from Schuylkill County where all of my petrified bones,
teeth and soft organs were found - I wrote:
<
"Ruling for the plaintiffs (evolutionists) would create a cadre of
secular humanist taught to revile my specimens without a fair hearing.
These hominid remains exist in profusion under the very feet of the
students who would be denied the freedom of full, scientific inquiry
because the existence of these bones in coal beds threatens a tenet of
the faith of secular humanism.
<
"Intelligent Design is deity-neutral and does not constitute any
establishment of religion. The Nobel Prize-winning co-discovered of
the DNA molecule, atheist James Watson, theorized a ‘seeding’ of life
from space after concluding that DNA was too complex to have evolved
on earth.
<
"Intelligent Design is evidence-friendly and tolerant of atheist
constructs. In contrast, evolution has a long history of fraud and
coercion, like the Piltdown Man, scandal and withering attacks on its
‘enemies' " - but they, corrupt members of the Scientific
Establishment, are the true enemies of truth and integrity about
mankind’s origin and ancestry.
<
<

Google