|
|
| Author |
Message |
Jason medicine forum Guru
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 1120
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:44 pm Post subject:
Questions for evolutionists
|
|
|
Evolutionists have asked me various questions. I have some questions for
evolutionists.
We have discussed "intermediate forms" in other posts. If macro-evolution
is true, do you think that there would be fossil evidence showing
intermediate forms?
Yes or No
Intermediate forms rarely exist in the fossil record. Do you believe that
this means that macro-evolution is not a valid theory?
Yes or No
While in a college evolution class, we heard an interesting theory about
how human babies developed the ability to smile. The professor told us
that when a group of "cavemen and cavewomen" were in danger that they
would rescue (pick-up and carry) smiling babies but would leave behind the
babies that never smiled. In other words, the smiling babies were the only
ones that grew to adulthood. Those cave people (according to the theory)
continued this tradition for many generations. The professor explained to
us that this was the reason that human babies almost always smile when an
adult approaches them while they are laying on their backs.
Choose A, B or C
A. This is a theory that "assumes" that the THEORY of evolution is true.
In other words, it's a theory about a theory.
B. This is mere speculation designed to influence the minds of students.
C. This is an attempt to brainwash students.
Do you think that they professor should have told the students that those
people involved in the intelligent designer movement believe that the
reason humans (including babies) smile is because the ID created the trait
of smiling and various other traits. The reason that babies smile is
because they inherited the trait from their ancestors. In other words,
babies and adults would not be able to smile unless the ID had created the
trait of smiling.
Yes--he should have told the students the above information.
No--he should never lecture or teach the aspects of the ID movement.
Do you believe that public school teachers should be allowed to teach
Intelligent Design as well as evolution in science classes?
Yes or No
Do you believe that one of the reasons that evolutionists rush to court
whenever a school system wants to teach ID is because they are concerned
that the students might realize that ID has more validity?
Yes or No
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:12 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Mortgage | Debt Consolidation | Personal Car Finance | Myspace Layouts | Debt Consolidation
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
electronics forum,
Science forum
Unix/Linux blog
Unix/Linux documentation
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|