|
|
| Author |
Message |
Fidelis K. medicine forum beginner
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:12 am Post subject:
IOL with the best track record?
|
|
|
Is a particular IOL brand considered the best in terms of safety (e.g.,
complications such as secondary cataract, etc)? I'm having cataract surgery
on 8/09 and will meet the surgeon on 7/31. I just want to know if a
particular brand stands out among various IOLs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
William Stacy medicine forum Guru
Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 1177
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:09 am Post subject:
Re: IOL with the best track record?
|
|
|
Fidelis K. wrote:
| Quote: | Is a particular IOL brand considered the best in terms of safety (e.g.,
complications such as secondary cataract, etc)? I'm having cataract surgery
on 8/09 and will meet the surgeon on 7/31. I just want to know if a
particular brand stands out among various IOLs.
|
I think it might depend more on what the surgeon is accustomed to using,
and would go with his/her recommendations. I do think a relatively
sharp edge design is better for preventing sec. cat., esp. if the
surgeon polishes the posterior capsule. I have Technis IOLs and they are
great because they also correct spherical aberration (there are now a
few brands that do that). Most importantly, I would not let a surgeon
talk me into a multifocal IOL or a focus changing design.
w.stacy, o.d. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ACP medicine forum beginner
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:57 pm Post subject:
Re: IOL with the best track record?
|
|
|
<snip>
| Quote: | Most importantly, I would not let a surgeon talk me into a multifocal IOL
or a focus changing design.
w.stacy, o.d.
|
Could you elaborate a bit?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
William Stacy medicine forum Guru
Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 1177
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:49 pm Post subject:
Re: IOL with the best track record?
|
|
|
I think the evidence shows that the focusing lenses, like the
crystallens don't really give much "accommodation" if any, and to
implant that bulky hinged lens without hope for much focusing, is bad
medicine, imo.
Re the multifocals, all multifocals cause more light scatter than the
equivalent single vision lenses, which obviously will compromise night
vision, at least. Also, less than half the incoming light will be in
focus at any particular viewing distance, which is why reading in dim
lighting (e.g. in a restaurant, etc.) is not any where near as good as
with single vision iols plus spectacle readers).
If the patient absolutely refuses to wear supplemental glasses under any
circumstances, then multifocal iols may be indicated, but I think that's
a rare patient who has to be fully informed that the vision will not be
perfect at any distance whatsoever.
w.stacy, o.d.
ACP wrote:
| Quote: | snip
Most importantly, I would not let a surgeon talk me into a multifocal IOL
or a focus changing design.
w.stacy, o.d.
Could you elaborate a bit?
Thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ACP medicine forum beginner
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:19 am Post subject:
Re: IOL with the best track record?
|
|
|
Thanks for your input.
"William Stacy" <wstacy@obase.net> wrote in message news:oi8vg.50258$VE1.34750@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
I think the evidence shows that the focusing lenses, like the crystallens don't really give much "accommodation" if any, and to implant that bulky hinged lens without hope for much focusing, is bad medicine, imo.
Re the multifocals, all multifocals cause more light scatter than the equivalent single vision lenses, which obviously will compromise night vision, at least. Also, less than half the incoming light will be in focus at any particular viewing distance, which is why reading in dim lighting (e.g. in a restaurant, etc.) is not any where near as good as with single vision iols plus spectacle readers).
If the patient absolutely refuses to wear supplemental glasses under any circumstances, then multifocal iols may be indicated, but I think that's a rare patient who has to be fully informed that the vision will not be perfect at any distance whatsoever.
w.stacy, o.d.
ACP wrote:
<snip>
Most importantly, I would not let a surgeon talk me into a multifocal IOL
or a focus changing design.
w.stacy, o.d.
Could you elaborate a bit?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:35 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Loans | Carpet Shop | Secured Loans | Power Rangers | Glitter Graphics
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
electronics forum,
Science forum
Unix/Linux blog
Unix/Linux documentation
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|