|
|
| Author |
Message |
Steve Marcus
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 36
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 1:31 pm Post subject:
Re: FULL OF s**t
|
|
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
news:j2Xtg.569$AP3.483@fe06.lga...
| Quote: | "Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamout_@cox.net> wrote in message
news:tFUtg.66513$9c6.42764@dukeread11...
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
news:A%Ntg.12$Ri2.3@fe04.lga...
"Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamout_@cox.net> wrote in message
news:zaMtg.66481$9c6.62124@dukeread11...
"Al" <al@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:e96ebh01q4g@enews3.newsguy.com...
Andrew B. Chung, wrote:
(nonsense)
Chung is a liar. Here's the proof:
Andrew B. Chung, wrote:
Did not attempt exorcism.
Wanna bet, Chung? Here's EXACTLY what you said:
"In the infinitely powerful and holy name of LORD Jesus Christ, I
command you, demon, to come out and leave Philip before our LORD
personally destroys you. "
Later, when accused of performing some sort of exorcism,... he wimps
out
and spouts "Such is the LORD's work"
Chung caught in a boldfaced lie! Game over.
So Al,
It's been two or three weeks since we discussed the matter of your
bandwidth
eating posts. Have you made any progress shutting Chung up? Doesn't
appear
so, does it?
If you're concerned with bandwidth, perhaps you should address your
concerns
to the chief bandwidth waster (i.e., Chung).
Alternatively, you might want to consider upgrading to broadband and/or
employing filters in your newsreader.
HTH
GG
So how about if I'm concerned with cardiac issues and don't feel as
though
I
have to have a screen full of unopened posts with titles such as Al
chooses
to use? Chung's posts are sometimes valuable, and those that aren't are
easily discernable and deleted. Which of Al's posts have any value,
other
than to inflate Al's ego?
Simple, then...killfile or ignore Al's posts.
If you look far enough back in the archives, however, you'll see that this
NG used to have a higher signal-to-noise ratio prior to Andy's descent
into
hyperreligiosity. He's the one responsible initiating most of the
"noise".
And even though I sometimes reply to him, in his current mental state it's
probably not worth the effort.
GG
|
Who died and appointed you a Junior Netkop??
I've been looking at, and occasionally posting to, this newsgroup since the
late '90s. I know the history of Chung's posting habits, and I believe that
I understand his discent of his posting habits into the lunacy of
"hyperrligiosty." That Chung is in the wrong with respect to posting
religious crap in sci.med.cardiology, Al (and others of his ilk) are at
least as wrong in posting a neverending stream of posts loading with foul
language and venom. The difference betweeen Al's posts (and the posts of
others of Al' ilk) and Chung's is that Chung *is* a cardiologist, *has*
posted, and *continues to* post, material on topic in this newsgroup that is
both accurate and a good starting point from which to look for further
information.
Why don't you try Netkoping Al and the others of his ilk, if it makes you
feel important to Netkop?
| Quote: |
So tell me,school boy, just what have you accomplished with your
posts,
other than making yourself feel important?
Since you've written "Game over.", does that mean that you'll take
your
bandwidth eatting Netkop program to another newsgroup?
Steve
--
Steve
|
Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GaryG
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 525
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:23 am Post subject:
Re: FULL OF s**t
|
|
|
"Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamout_@cox.net> wrote in message
news:576ug.66535$9c6.40483@dukeread11...
| Quote: |
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
news:j2Xtg.569$AP3.483@fe06.lga...
"Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamout_@cox.net> wrote in message
news:tFUtg.66513$9c6.42764@dukeread11...
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
news:A%Ntg.12$Ri2.3@fe04.lga...
"Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamout_@cox.net> wrote in message
news:zaMtg.66481$9c6.62124@dukeread11...
"Al" <al@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:e96ebh01q4g@enews3.newsguy.com...
Andrew B. Chung, wrote:
(nonsense)
Chung is a liar. Here's the proof:
Andrew B. Chung, wrote:
Did not attempt exorcism.
Wanna bet, Chung? Here's EXACTLY what you said:
"In the infinitely powerful and holy name of LORD Jesus Christ, I
command you, demon, to come out and leave Philip before our LORD
personally destroys you. "
Later, when accused of performing some sort of exorcism,... he
wimps
out
and spouts "Such is the LORD's work"
Chung caught in a boldfaced lie! Game over.
So Al,
It's been two or three weeks since we discussed the matter of your
bandwidth
eating posts. Have you made any progress shutting Chung up? Doesn't
appear
so, does it?
If you're concerned with bandwidth, perhaps you should address your
concerns
to the chief bandwidth waster (i.e., Chung).
Alternatively, you might want to consider upgrading to broadband
and/or
employing filters in your newsreader.
HTH
GG
So how about if I'm concerned with cardiac issues and don't feel as
though
I
have to have a screen full of unopened posts with titles such as Al
chooses
to use? Chung's posts are sometimes valuable, and those that aren't
are
easily discernable and deleted. Which of Al's posts have any value,
other
than to inflate Al's ego?
Simple, then...killfile or ignore Al's posts.
If you look far enough back in the archives, however, you'll see that
this
NG used to have a higher signal-to-noise ratio prior to Andy's descent
into
hyperreligiosity. He's the one responsible initiating most of the
"noise".
And even though I sometimes reply to him, in his current mental state
it's
probably not worth the effort.
GG
Who died and appointed you a Junior Netkop??
I've been looking at, and occasionally posting to, this newsgroup since
the
late '90s. I know the history of Chung's posting habits, and I believe
that
I understand his discent of his posting habits into the lunacy of
"hyperrligiosty." That Chung is in the wrong with respect to posting
religious crap in sci.med.cardiology, Al (and others of his ilk) are at
least as wrong in posting a neverending stream of posts loading with foul
language and venom. The difference betweeen Al's posts (and the posts of
others of Al' ilk) and Chung's is that Chung *is* a cardiologist, *has*
posted, and *continues to* post, material on topic in this newsgroup that
is
both accurate and a good starting point from which to look for further
information.
Why don't you try Netkoping Al and the others of his ilk, if it makes you
feel important to Netkop?
|
Hmmm...it seems to me that your original post to Al (see below), was a good
example of "Netkopping".
FWIW, I didn't suggest that you, or anyone else, alter their posting
behavior.
GG
| Quote: |
So tell me,school boy, just what have you accomplished with your
posts,
other than making yourself feel important?
Since you've written "Game over.", does that mean that you'll take
your
bandwidth eatting Netkop program to another newsgroup?
Steve
--
Steve
Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:16 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Mortgage Calculator | Yahoo Personals Coupons | Mortgage Loans | Mortgage Calculator | Mortgages
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
electronics forum,
Science forum
Unix/Linux blog
Unix/Linux documentation
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Medicine forums
»
cardiology
