FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Medicine forums » nursing
Autism: It's not ancient, it's new.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 6 of 6 [77 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
Mark Probert
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 1720

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Autism: It's not ancient, it's new. Reply with quote

john wrote:
Quote:
"Jason Johnson" <jason@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:jason-1307061040300001@66-52-22-100.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net...
In article <nuudnZfIWI7w4yvZRVnyvA@bt.com>, "john" <sc@nospam.com> wrote:

"Jason Johnson" <jason@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:jason-1207061046560001@66-52-22-53.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net...
John,
Thanks for your post. Thanks also for your concern for children. I do
believe (but have NO proof) that there were autistic children during
those
years before we had any vaccines. Let's assume that mercury is the cause
of autism. If that is true, it means that some of those children (that
lived in ancient times) would have developed autism if they were exposed
to mercury. Since there were NO vaccines containing mercury in those
days--the rates of autism would have been lower in those days. The type
of
mercury in fish (methylmercury) is even more dangerous than the type of
mercury in thimerosal.
Jason

"You couldn't even construct a study that shows thimerosal is safe. It's
just too darn toxic. If you inject thimerosal into an animal, its brain will
sicken. If you apply it to living tissue, the cells die. If you put it in a
petri dish, the culture dies. Knowing these things, it would be shocking if
one could inject it into an infant without causing damage." ----Dr. Boyd
Haley, Professor and Chair, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Kentucky and
one of the world's leading authorities on mercury toxicity. (Excerpt from
Deadly Immunity)

Boyd Haley's antics are addressed:

http://neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/102/plaintiffs-gambit-failed-rhogam-decision

Haley is/was a professor of chemistry who utters the mantra "Thimerosal
is 49.X% mercury" when he knows damn well that this is meaningless in
chemistry.
Back to top
\"Jan Drew\"
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 353

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Autism: It's not ancient, it's new. Reply with quote

"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:j1Ptg.7$po4.0@fe10.lga...
Quote:
john wrote:
"Jason Johnson" <jason@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:jason-1307061040300001@66-52-22-100.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net...
In article <nuudnZfIWI7w4yvZRVnyvA@bt.com>, "john" <sc@nospam.com
wrote:

"Jason Johnson" <jason@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:jason-1207061046560001@66-52-22-53.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net...
John,
Thanks for your post. Thanks also for your concern for children. I do
believe (but have NO proof) that there were autistic children during
those
years before we had any vaccines. Let's assume that mercury is the
cause
of autism. If that is true, it means that some of those children (that
lived in ancient times) would have developed autism if they were
exposed
to mercury. Since there were NO vaccines containing mercury in those
days--the rates of autism would have been lower in those days. The type
of
mercury in fish (methylmercury) is even more dangerous than the type of
mercury in thimerosal.
Jason

"You couldn't even construct a study that shows thimerosal is safe. It's
just too darn toxic. If you inject thimerosal into an animal, its brain
will sicken. If you apply it to living tissue, the cells die. If you put
it in a petri dish, the culture dies. Knowing these things, it would be
shocking if one could inject it into an infant without causing
damage." ----Dr. Boyd Haley, Professor and Chair, Dept. of Chemistry,
University of Kentucky and one of the world's leading authorities on
mercury toxicity. (Excerpt from Deadly Immunity)

Boyd Haley's antics are addressed:

Oh...really?
Quote:

http://neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/102/plaintiffs-gambit-failed-rhogam-decision

Haley is/was a professor of chemistry who utters the mantra "Thimerosal is
49.X% mercury" when he knows damn well that this is meaningless in
chemistry.

Speaking of antics...wait add DISHONESTY.

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a
Suspended Attorney, Respondent.
Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

92-02731

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT

183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747

November 9, 1992, Decided

PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the
Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on
February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S.
Probert.

DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline
upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is
granted; and it is further,

HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings

Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to
cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance
Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.

COUNSEL:

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for
petitioner.

JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ.,
concur.

Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the
respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and
it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law 90, effective immediately,
the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken
from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's
rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned
attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law 90, the respondent,
Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from
practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or
employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or
counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission
or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to
the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4)
from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and
counselor-at-law.

OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.

OPINION: [*282]

[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29,
1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the
further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with
the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4,
1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and
prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent
and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.

[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon
the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The
petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The
motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992.
The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the
default motion.

The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate
with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of
professional misconduct.

The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a
disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has
chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must
be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent
in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly,
the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of
attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately

Source:

NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT

Currency Status:

ARCHIVE RECORD

NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION

Name:

MARK PROBERT

Date Of Birth:

11/XX/1946

Gender:

MALE

Address:

1698 WEBSTER AVE

MERRICK, NY 11566

County:

NASSAU

Phone:

516-968-5572

EMPLOYER INFORMATION

Employer:

MARK S PROBERT ESQ

Organization:

PERSON

LICENSING INFORMATION

Licensing Agency:

NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION

License/Certification Type:

ATTORNEY

License Number:

1253889

Issue Date:

00/00/1978

License Status:

DISBARRED

License State:

NY
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 6 of 6 [77 Posts] Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:46 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Medicine forums » nursing
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Vaccinations & Autism & Breast Implants & Genetics ..... BreastImplantAwareness.or nursing 15 Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:23 pm
No new posts Vaccinations & Autism & Breast Implants & Genetics ... BreastImplantAwareness.or nursing 0 Sat Jul 15, 2006 1:48 am
No new posts Fombonne's autism research is dangerously inaccurate john nursing 18 Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:38 am
No new posts AUTISM: THE EVOLUTION OF A DISEASE by Bryan Jepson, MD john nursing 38 Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:26 pm
No new posts Vaccine autism evidence overwhelming john hepatitis 0 Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:22 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: email marketing campaigns , electronics forum, Science forum, Unix/Linux blog, Unix/Linux documentation, Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0476s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0102s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]