|
|
| Author |
Message |
bcpg@canada.com medicine forum beginner
Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:26 pm Post subject:
A Broken Promise Because of a Dairy Whore
|
|
|
I've Broken a Promise
A few months ago, after reviewing the umpteenth bit of
phony dairy research by uncovering a fatal flaw that the
media neglected to note, I promised myself that I was
finished wasting my time countering every biased and
ridiculous piece of research submitted by the dairy
industry. I promised that I would ignore future stories,
for they waste my time and the media has shown that they
are not inclined to report the truth by biting the hand
which feeds them.
I've read dozens of newspaper accounts of the latest
phony dairy study and not one of them reveals that the
study was financed by the Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC).
This past weekend, this new story hit the newspapers.
If you believe what you read, it's dangerous for a
pregnant woman not to drink cow's milk because her
child will be born severely underweight. Let me quote
the reaction of the Toronto Sun:
"Women who aren't drinking enough milk during pregnancy
are giving birth to smaller babies, putting their
developing infants at harm, a Canadian study suggests."
The Ottawa Citizen had the temerity to report:
"Women who cut down on milk while pregnant can harm
their developing babies nearly as much as if they
smoked, new Canadian research shows."
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=539c1784-a3ea-
4dc8-ba
c8-e423076f2825
Tiny URL: http://tinyurl.com/fzttn
The study has been published in the April 25, 2006 issue of
the Canadian Medical Association Journal. Scientists found
that infants born to mothers who drank little or no milk
weighed 1-1.5 ounces less than infants born to women who
drank a lot of milk.
So...an eight pound 4 ounce baby from a milk drinker might
weigh only 8 pounds and 3 ounces from a non-milk drinker.
As Snagglepus the Lion (Yogi Bear's friend) used to say,
"Heavens to Mergatroid!" I, on the other hand, might have
used other richly descriptive adjectives to voice my
displeasure at the absurdity of dairy deceivers.
Let's analyze this non-traumatic weight difference scenario.
Women consuming extraneous growth hormones from cows
have infants that will weigh one ounce more. Is this a good
thing in the 21st century in which an obesity epidemic
defines our kids? Do we want our children-to-be exposed to
powerful steroid and protein growth hormones as our little
ones grow in mom's uterus?
The headline could easily have read:
"Moms who drink milk birth obese little chub-balls."
Please let the scientist/researcher who took money
from the Canadian Dairy Board and then came to her
unethically phony conclusion know the word most often
applied to a man or woman who rents body or soul for
dollars. The senior author's name is:
Cynthia Mannion
Tel: 403.210.3848
FAX: cmannion@...
The bottom line...yes, I lied. I could not leave this story
alone. Please forgive me, but I could not allow the bastards
to get away with another one...
Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Just Ed medicine forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 120
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:39 pm Post subject:
Dairy Whore doesn't know that reporters write newspaper stories
|
|
|
bcpg@canada.com wrote:
| Quote: | I've Broken a Promise
A few months ago, after reviewing the umpteenth bit of
phony dairy research by uncovering a fatal flaw that the
media neglected to note, I promised myself that I was
finished wasting my time countering every biased and
ridiculous piece of research submitted by the dairy
industry. I promised that I would ignore future stories,
for they waste my time and the media has shown that they
are not inclined to report the truth by biting the hand
which feeds them.
I've read dozens of newspaper accounts of the latest
phony dairy study and not one of them reveals that the
study was financed by the Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC).
|
So you're complaining about the newpaper stories. That's
not science, that's journalism.
The funding source is clearly marked if you lift a finger to look:
http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16636326
The other sponsor was FRSQ, Fonds de recherche en Santé
du Québec. If your newspapers don't provide this info, complain
about them, not the study.
| Quote: | This past weekend, this new story hit the newspapers.
If you believe what you read, it's dangerous for a
pregnant woman not to drink cow's milk because her
child will be born severely underweight. Let me quote
the reaction of the Toronto Sun:
"Women who aren't drinking enough milk during pregnancy
are giving birth to smaller babies, putting their
developing infants at harm, a Canadian study suggests."
|
I didn't see anything like that in the study text.
That Toronto newspaper's reporter is poor.
| Quote: | The Ottawa Citizen had the temerity to report:
"Women who cut down on milk while pregnant can harm
their developing babies nearly as much as if they
smoked, new Canadian research shows."
|
I didn't see anything like that in the study text.
That Ottawa newspaper's reporter is poor.
<snip non-functional links, bullshit about hormones
which are not mentioned at all in the study & not related
to anything else in the post>
| Quote: | The headline could easily have read:
"Moms who drink milk birth obese little chub-balls."
Please let the scientist/researcher who took money
from the Canadian Dairy Board and then came to her
unethically phony conclusion know the word most often
applied to a man or woman who rents body or soul for
dollars. The senior author's name is:
snip |
You should only complain to the study author about what the
study says. The newspaper articles which are the source of all
of your complaints were written by reporters, not by the study
author.
You have repeatedly confused the science with what the
newspapers have reported. I don't believe that you're that
stupid but rather you are doing this to try to fool people
into believing that you have an issue here. Why aren't you
posting this to more approp. journalism ngs instead of a
sci group?
You have made no complaint about anything that the study
stated. I suppose that means you must be happy with the
sponsoring Dairy Farmers of Canada for the service they
have done unto mankind by sponsoring this fine (unbiased)
research. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:42 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Free Insurance Quotes | Free Credit Reports | TurboTax Software | Mortgage Calculator | Remortgages
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
electronics forum,
Science forum
Unix/Linux blog
Unix/Linux documentation
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|