FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » diseases » lyme
Bartonella elizabethae, 12.5%; in Los ANgeles Homeless!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
CaliforniaLyme
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 2066

PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 4:35 am    Post subject: Bartonella elizabethae, 12.5%; in Los ANgeles Homeless!!!!!!!!!!!! Reply with quote

Why the )!*&@^@ aren't we testing for this MORE>?!!! Instead of
simp[ly Henselae>?
AGH!!!!!!!!!!!!
*****************

1: J Infect Dis. 2002 Dec 1;186(11):1673-6. Epub 2002 Nov 1. Related
Articles, Links


Prevalence study of antibody to ratborne pathogens and other agents
among patients using a free clinic in downtown Los Angeles.

Smith HM, Reporter R, Rood MP, Linscott AJ, Mascola LM, Hogrefe W,
Purcell RH.

Acute Communicable Disease Control Unit, Los Angeles County Department
of Health Services, California 90012, USA. hsmith@dhs.co.la.ca.us

Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) are hosts for various microbes.
Homeless people who have contact with rats may be at risk of infection
by them. The Los Angeles County Department of Health Services initiated
a seroepidemiologic study among patients who used a free clinic in
downtown Los Angeles; 200 serum specimens obtained for other routine
assays were tested for antibodies to ratborne pathogens and other
agents. The seroprevalence of antibody to hepatitis E virus in this
population was 13.6%; to Bartonella elizabethae, 12.5%; to B. quintana,
9.5%; to B. henselae, 3.5%; to Seoul virus, 0.5%; and to Rickettsia
typhi, 0.0%. This study found that patients and locally trapped rats
had antibodies to some of the same agents.

PMID: 12447746 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Back to top
overman74@hotmail.com
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 442

PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 4:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Bartonella elizabethae, 12.5%; in Los ANgeles Homeless!!!!!!!!!!!! Reply with quote

We are not testing because the "experts" at the IDSA (CDC too?) say
bartonella not proven to be a TBD in humans. Despite the fact that
bartonellas are found in the same ticks with lyme, etc.

And if we don't test for it, we won't find it. How simple is that?

If everything in medicine is handled by the major institutions in this
ignorant way, it is no wonder we have no cures or even causes for so
many major diseases.

It is astonishing that science can be so perverted by major players.
Back to top
CaliforniaLyme
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 2066

PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 7:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Bartonella elizabethae, 12.5%; in Los ANgeles Homeless!!!!!!!!!!!! Reply with quote

Yup!!! ANd it is INSANE that this wasn't front page news of the LA
Times!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I wish Igenex would offer more, wider TBD testing-
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:19 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » diseases » lyme
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Need Periodontist in Los Angeles Camilla Cracchiolo dentistry 2 Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:10 pm
No new posts cat scatch fever [Bartonella] and Rocky mountain spotted... georgia lyme 0 Sun May 07, 2006 7:35 pm
No new posts Los Angeles Dentist With Crohn's Patients icja9111@aol.com dentistry 5 Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:34 pm
No new posts Bartonella henselae infection associated with Guillain-Ba... georgia lyme 0 Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:45 pm
No new posts You thought it was safe to go back in the water>? 2005:B... CaliforniaLyme lyme 0 Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:48 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: email marketing campaigns , electronics forum, Science forum, Unix/Linux blog, Unix/Linux documentation, Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1469s ][ Queries: 16 (0.1219s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]