FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » diseases » cancer
Chemotherapy in early breast cancer
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [5 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Peter Moran
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 109

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2005 7:04 pm    Post subject: Chemotherapy in early breast cancer Reply with quote

I confess to having had the suspicion that adjuvant chemotherapy was being
used too readily
in early breast cancer in some quarters, especially in the US. I was
wrong.

A recently published meta-analysis of fifteen year results published in the
Lancet
shows that -

"Allocation to about 6 months of anthracycline-based polychemotherapy (eg,
with FAC or FEC) reduces the annual breast cancer death rate by about 38%
(SE 5) for women younger than 50 years of age when diagnosed and by about
20% (SE 4) for those of age 50-69 years when diagnosed, largely irrespective
of the use of tamoxifen and of oestrogen receptor (ER) status, nodal status,
or other tumour characteristics."

Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on
recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials M
Clarke, R Collins, S Darby, C Davies, et al. The Lancet. London: May 14-May
20, 2005.Vol.365, Iss. 9472; pg. 1687

Peter Moran


Peter Moran
Back to top
Steph
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 504

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2005 8:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Chemotherapy in early breast cancer Reply with quote

"Peter Moran" <moringa@gil.com.au> wrote in message
news:42924571$0$262$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au...
Quote:
I confess to having had the suspicion that adjuvant chemotherapy was being
used too readily
in early breast cancer in some quarters, especially in the US. I was
wrong.


I'm not sure you were wrong Peter

The prognosis for early stage breast cancer is VERY good, chemo or not. The
38% reduction in death rate is maybe 3% in absolute terms.

In addition, at least some, if not all, of the beneficial effects of chemo
in pre menopausal women is related to depressed ovarian function, and there
are much less toxic ways to achieve that than chemotherapy.

There was really no new news in that Lancet paper.

Quote:
A recently published meta-analysis of fifteen year results published in
the Lancet
shows that -

"Allocation to about 6 months of anthracycline-based polychemotherapy (eg,
with FAC or FEC) reduces the annual breast cancer death rate by about 38%
(SE 5) for women younger than 50 years of age when diagnosed and by about
20% (SE 4) for those of age 50-69 years when diagnosed, largely
irrespective
of the use of tamoxifen and of oestrogen receptor (ER) status, nodal
status,
or other tumour characteristics."

Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on
recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials M
Clarke, R Collins, S Darby, C Davies, et al. The Lancet. London: May
14-May
20, 2005.Vol.365, Iss. 9472; pg. 1687

Peter Moran


Peter Moran

Back to top
J
medicine forum addict


Joined: 07 May 2005
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2005 11:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Chemotherapy in early breast cancer Reply with quote

Peter Moran wrote:

Quote:
I confess to having had the suspicion that adjuvant chemotherapy was being
used too readily
in early breast cancer in some quarters, especially in the US. I was
wrong.

A recently published meta-analysis of fifteen year results published in the
Lancet
shows that -

"Allocation to about 6 months of anthracycline-based polychemotherapy (eg,
with FAC or FEC) reduces the annual breast cancer death rate by about 38%
(SE 5) for women younger than 50 years of age when diagnosed and by about
20% (SE 4) for those of age 50-69 years when diagnosed, largely irrespective
of the use of tamoxifen and of oestrogen receptor (ER) status, nodal status,
or other tumour characteristics."

Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on
recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials M
Clarke, R Collins, S Darby, C Davies, et al. The Lancet. London: May 14-May
20, 2005.Vol.365, Iss. 9472; pg. 1687


Have they declared any conflicts of interest?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3513791.stm
J
Back to top
Peter Moran
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 109

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:56 am    Post subject: Re: Chemotherapy in early breast cancer Reply with quote

"J" <philmath@example.com> wrote in message
news:429280DC.7E0BBBD7@execulink.com...
Quote:
Peter Moran wrote:

I confess to having had the suspicion that adjuvant chemotherapy was
being
used too readily
in early breast cancer in some quarters, especially in the US. I was
wrong.

A recently published meta-analysis of fifteen year results published in
the
Lancet
shows that -

"Allocation to about 6 months of anthracycline-based polychemotherapy
(eg,
with FAC or FEC) reduces the annual breast cancer death rate by about 38%
(SE 5) for women younger than 50 years of age when diagnosed and by about
20% (SE 4) for those of age 50-69 years when diagnosed, largely
irrespective
of the use of tamoxifen and of oestrogen receptor (ER) status, nodal
status,
or other tumour characteristics."

Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on
recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials M
Clarke, R Collins, S Darby, C Davies, et al. The Lancet. London: May
14-May
20, 2005.Vol.365, Iss. 9472; pg. 1687


Have they declared any conflicts of interest?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3513791.stm
J

No. And a number of different trials from different centres are included
in the meta-analysis.

Peter Moran



Quote:

Back to top
Peter Moran
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 109

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 5:21 am    Post subject: Re: Chemotherapy in early breast cancer Reply with quote

"Steph" <steph@vancouvers.island> wrote in message
news:myske.1459400$6l.605199@pd7tw2no...
Quote:

"Peter Moran" <moringa@gil.com.au> wrote in message
news:42924571$0$262$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au...
I confess to having had the suspicion that adjuvant chemotherapy was being
used too readily
in early breast cancer in some quarters, especially in the US. I was
wrong.


I'm not sure you were wrong Peter

The prognosis for early stage breast cancer is VERY good, chemo or not.
The 38% reduction in death rate is maybe 3% in absolute terms.

I take your point. Quoting the paper--

"With 74 000 years of follow-up among untreated women with breast cancer of
known ER and nodal status in these trials (36 000 in ER-positive
node-negative, 16 000 in ER-positive node-positive, 17 000 in ER-poor
node-negative, and 5000 in ER-poor node-positive disease), the breast cancer
mortality at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, is 7%, 20%, and 31% in
ER-positive node-negative disease, and 23%, 51%, and 63% in ER-positive
node-positive disease. Among untreated women of the same nodal status, the
breast cancer death rate is about twice as great in ER-poor as in
ER-positive disease during just the first 5 or 6 years, but it is
substantially lower in ER-poor than in ER-positive disease over the next 10
years, so the 15-year breast cancer mortality of untreated women is largely
independent of ER status (and of age; webappendix 1"

So the absolute reduction in mortality is 38/100 X 31 equals a 12% gain in
fifteen year survival (twelve lives saved per hundred) even in
node-negative disease, and regardless of ER status, and with six months only
of chemotherapy. This is better than I expected and would represent many
thousands of lives saved out of the two hundred thousand plus cases of BC
yearly in the US alone..

You are right that this is merely a snapshot of how we stood over fifteen
years ago. Better ways classifying cancer into prognostic categories are
now available. The urgent need is to be able to select out those women who
have such negligible chances of dying from their breast cancer as to not
justify chemotherapy, and deciding where that line should be drawn. Minimal
morbidity has been shown from the chemotherapy in the same studies..

Peter Moran
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [5 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:01 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » diseases » cancer
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Diet supplements don't benefit cancer... J cancer 0 Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:01 am
No new posts Seaweed extract may help halt cervica... Roman Bystrianyk cancer 0 Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:34 am
No new posts Proteins, linked to pancreatic cancer... J cancer 2 Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:00 pm
No new posts Racial gap in uterine cancer survival... J cancer 0 Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:08 pm
No new posts Phenotype and genotype of hereditary ... scimedweb@mail.com patology 0 Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:42 pm

Gardening | Cheap Loan | Advertising | Remortgages | Mobile Phones
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: electronics forum, Science forum Unix/Linux blog Unix/Linux documentation Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.2254s ][ Queries: 16 (0.1305s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]