|
|
| Author |
Message |
Steph
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 504
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: pharma and cancer: who profits
|
|
|
"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1107759240.604960.218240@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Right. Like all that educated common sense that flourishes in clincial
trials of which we now see the evidence: paxil, prozac, vioxx,
celebrex, naproxyn, baycol...
Which pharma pays you to shill here Steph. Which pharma(s) own you,
while the taxpayers of British Columbia think you work for them.
Wouldn't BCMH be interested to see that abusive little post an
oncologist made to a potential oncology patient?
|
Snip your NGs, there's a good blackmailer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 612
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Proctology / Iron / colorectal cancer
|
|
|
"ironjustice@aol.com" wrote:
| Quote: | http://tinyurl.com/5qu88
Who loves ya.
|
---
And as 'per my qualifications' .. I AM A FRIGGIN NOBEL PRIZE WINNER ..
and my proof is EVERY MEDICAL DISEASE THERE IS .. and that ..
is ALL THAT FRIGGIN MATTERS on this medical newsgroup.
-Tom Hennessy (ironjustice@aol.com)
Message-ID: <0021214180459.28328.00000...@mb-fo.aol.com>
Message-ID:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.laboratory/msg/a3265ecc1d898754 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kristofer Dale
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 14
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: UNM prevails against Knight/Scallen in lawsuit on patents
|
|
|
Stephalococcus wrote:
| Quote: | Like some sour grapes with that diatomaceous earth?
|
BTW, speaking of sour grapes, that little rat bastard piece of fucking
s**t, David E. Thomas, of New Mexicans for Science and Reason has
posted a link to this thread, so I'll take this opportunity to share
some of his chicken-s**t exploits with his readers... ;^]
http://www.nmsr.org/controvy.htm
http://www.nmia.com/~barefoot/feedback.htm
http://www.nmia.com/~barefoot/dbcomm.htm
"D.T." ( nmsrdave@swcp.com or alcazarus@yahoo.com )is highly incensed
that I used his email to hoist him with his own petard, so to speak,
and has gone through great lengths and much compensatory posturing to
basically make himself out to be an even bigger fuckhead than he was
previously. Nevertheless, and in the spirit of humility and comraderie,
I posted this apology:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.bio.entomology.misc/browse_thread/thread/36f794b96dfa4d67/7548025ddaf9249c?tvc=2&q=%22public+apology%22+%22kristofer+dale%22#7548025ddaf9249c
Kristofer Dale,
ragged individualist,
statistic at large... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Steph
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 504
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: UNM prevails against Knight/Scallen in lawsuit on patents
|
|
|
"Kristofer Dale" <barefoot@nmia.com> wrote in message
news:1111120156.427997.300960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Stephalococcus wrote:
Like some sour grapes with that diatomaceous earth?
BTW, speaking of sour grapes, that little rat bastard piece of fucking
s**t, David E. Thomas, of New Mexicans for Science and Reason has
posted a link to this thread, so I'll take this opportunity to share
some of his chicken-s**t exploits with his readers... ;^]
http://www.nmsr.org/controvy.htm
http://www.nmia.com/~barefoot/feedback.htm
http://www.nmia.com/~barefoot/dbcomm.htm
"D.T." ( nmsrdave@swcp.com or alcazarus@yahoo.com )is highly incensed
that I used his email to hoist him with his own petard, so to speak,
and has gone through great lengths and much compensatory posturing to
basically make himself out to be an even bigger fuckhead than he was
previously. Nevertheless, and in the spirit of humility and comraderie,
I posted this apology:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.bio.entomology.misc/browse_thread/thread/36f794b96dfa4d67/7548025ddaf9249c?tvc=2&q=%22public+apology%22+%22kristofer+dale%22#7548025ddaf9249c
Kristofer Dale,
ragged individualist,
statistic at large...
|
Nice to see you're popular with others Ch(K)ris |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Cohen
medicine forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 116
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: European Cell Phone Study
|
|
|
Robert Cohen wrote:
a sort of follow-up/update of the above reteurs, december 04, article,
a phenomena i've been worrying about since the ..1970s? (or whenever
the miraculous--too good to be "true"--analog cellular phone hooked me)
Do phones harm children's brains?
By _DONNA GORDON BLANKINSHIP, Associated Press
March 21, 2005
SEATTLE - Parents should think twice before giving in to a
middle-schooler's demands for a cell phone, some scientists say,
because potential long-term health risks remain unclear.
Researchers have speculated for more than 10 years that the
electromagnetic radiation emitted from cell phones may damage DNA and
cause benign brain tumors, said Henry Lai, a bioengineering professor
at the University of Washington.
Advertisement
"We don't know very much about the health effects of cell-phone use on
kids, but there are speculations," Lai said.
In Britain, the chairman of the National Radiological Protection Board
advised in January that parents should not give mobile phones to
children age 8 or younger as a precaution against the potential harm of
radiation from the devices.
When you use a cell phone, 70 to 80 percent of the energy emitted from
the antenna is absorbed by the head, Lai said.
Last week, a federal appeals court in Maryland reinstated five
class-action lawsuits claiming that the cell phone industry has failed
to protect consumers from unsafe levels of radiation.
Several research studies have pointed to the potential impacts of
long-term absorption of cell phone-emitted radiation, but little of the
research has focused on the children.
Lai said he was concerned about the impact on children because young
skulls are thinner and the growing brain may be more susceptible to
radiation.
He also said that because brain tumors usually take 30-40 years to
develop, children who use cell phones from their teen years onward
would have a longer period of time to see a cumulative impact.
"We don't know if kids are really more susceptible," Lai said, but he
encourages everyone to use a headset to keep the antenna away from the
brain, "even if they're not cool."
Most research on the subject has stopped in the United States except
for some work supported by the cell phone industry, he added.
Independent studies continue in Europe.
A Swedish study published in October suggested that people who use a
cell phone for at least 10 years might increase their risk of
developing a rare benign tumor along a nerve on the side of the head
where they hold the phone.
The study's subjects had been using cell phones for at least 10 years,
nearly all analog models that emit more electromagnetic radiation than
the digital models now on the market.
Digital phones emit radiation in pulses; the older analog varieties
emit continuous waves. Since cell phones exploded in popularity in the
late 1990s, most of those sold used digital technology.
Copyright 2005, Associated Press. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mary Fisher
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 32
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Steady Diet of Soy Cuts Breast Cancer Risk
|
|
|
<drceephd2@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1114637088.789199.128920@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | I have two immediate questions about the consumption of soy.
First, was the soy fermented naturally or chemically processed?
Their is a health and taste difference.
Secondly, most people who consume soy are doing so to avoid the eating
of meat protein.
|
There are many other replacements.When we didn't eat meat we just didn't eat
meat, we didn't feel the need to substitute look-alikes.
| Quote: |
Perhaps the real conclusion should be that the reduction of meat
consumption can reduce breast cancer 22% even if you eat chemically
processed soy.
|
:-)
Mary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
J
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 612
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Meat diet / cancer / heart disease
|
|
|
Jeff wrote:
| Quote: | "J" <author@anon.inv> wrote in message
snip
You are seeing this message because Tom Hennessy aka ironjustice@aol.com
has posted a message in
alt.support.cancer
If you are new to this group, then please understand that his posts are
usually about iron, not eating red meat and bloodletting/giving. In his
mind, Hennessy believes he is a great researcher who has won a Nobel
Prize. In fact, he
merely copies medical material from the web and pastes it to usenet,
proudly calling this his research.
I haven't seen anything that suggests that Tom thinks he has a noble. While
I question the value of his posts, I don't remember him taking credit for
other people's work.
|
"And as 'per my qualifications' .. I AM A
FRIGGIN NOBEL PRIZE WINNER .. and my proof
is EVERY MEDICAL DISEASE THERE IS .. and
that .. is ALL THAT FRIGGIN MATTERS on this
medical newsgroup."
- Tom Hennessy ("doe"), Calgary, Canada. 14 Dec/2002
Message-ID: <0021214180459.28328.00000092@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.laboratory/msg/c830049fbbb6cdf9
| Quote: | snip
While I think Tom's posts are a waste of electrons, I resent you telling us
what to do.
|
Do whatever you wish. I'm posting it for the patients.
J |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Steady Diet of Soy Cuts Breast Cancer Risk
|
|
|
I have two immediate questions about the consumption of soy.
First, was the soy fermented naturally or chemically processed?
Their is a health and taste difference.
Secondly, most people who consume soy are doing so to avoid the eating
of meat protein.
Perhaps the real conclusion should be that the reduction of meat
consumption can reduce breast cancer 22% even if you eat chemically
processed soy.
DrC PhD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mary Fisher
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 32
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Steady Diet of Soy Cuts Breast Cancer Risk
|
|
|
"Roman Bystrianyk" <rbystrianyk@gmail.com> wrote in message
| Quote: |
One of the researchers, Lin Yan, is director of cancer research at The
Solae Co., which sells soy products.
|
Well well!
Mary
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Where Cialis, Viagra, Avodart to low cost?
|
|
|
| Quote: | Where to buy at the lowest price?
|
Hi,
I have found this excellent:
http://www.anagen.net/generics.htm
Mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sinead
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Meat diet / cancer / heart disease
|
|
|
<ironjustice@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113924157.142446.91390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ironjustice@aol.com
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 1522
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bodacious
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Meat diet / cancer / heart disease
|
|
|
If Jesus was a vegetarian, how come he performed a miracle that fed loaves &
FISHES to the crowd ?
Best wishes
Wess
<ironjustice@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113882624.420838.27350@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ironjustice@aol.com
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 1522
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Simm Webb
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 am Post subject:
Re: Meat diet / cancer / heart disease
|
|
|
Jeff wrote:
| Quote: | "J" <author@anon.inv> wrote in message
news:426409A2.6EC6E9C8@execulink.com...
"ironjustice@aol.com" wrote:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james22.htm
You are seeing this message because Tom Hennessy aka ironjustice@aol.com
has posted a message in
alt.support.cancer
If you are new to this group, then please understand that his posts are
usually about iron, not eating red meat and bloodletting/giving. In his
mind, Hennessy believes he is a great researcher who has won a Nobel
Prize. In fact, he
merely copies medical material from the web and pastes it to usenet,
proudly calling this his research.
I haven't seen anything that suggests that Tom thinks he has a noble. While
I question the value of his posts, I don't remember him taking credit for
other people's work.
As far as whether or not we wish to see Tom's posts, I think we can
determine that for ourselves.
Thanks anyway, but I think we can determine if all of Tom's screws are
tight or if we wish to read his posts.
While I think Tom's posts are a waste of electrons, I resent you telling us
what to do.
Jeff
(...)
|
I am not sorry but I have seen his trashy waste on so many different
areas of the newsnet, that he has truly entered himself in my records as
a true crackpot. He is an expert on all the diseases and feels that
iron either eaten or ignored is the solution for all. One of the future
days from now, he will post something that actually does make sense, but
we are not fooling around with a simple illness, and really have no time
for his blathering. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:18 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Homeowner Loan | Mortgage | Consolidation | Fish Tank Help | Cheap Plane Tickets
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
electronics forum,
Science forum
Unix/Linux blog
Unix/Linux documentation
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
diseases
»
cancer
