FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » diseases » lyme
This is what ignited the trolls
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
derdrittemann2003@yahoo.c
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 1799

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:52 am    Post subject: Re: WHO are YOU calling "trolls"? Reply with quote

trong wrote:
Quote:
The above is the typical drittemann approach to new visitors to this
board. He tries to suck in the innocent with his sales pitch, which is
that everyone on this board is insane or delusional with the exception
of him. He seems very calm and rational at first, but be forewarned -
this man is a dangerous psychological leopard, a pure sociopath - and
here, below, is a demonstration of how he's going to treat you once you

are firmly within the grasp of his evil talons.





Is that all you got? Faked messages? Yeah, that helps your credibility
enormously.

LMAO. You're totally losing it...(well, you never really had
it)...but...

You are what we call seriously one "mussed up" little princess...
Back to top
eugeneshapiroisapig
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2108

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:40 am    Post subject: Re: WHO are YOU calling "trolls"? Reply with quote

The above is the typical drittemann approach to new visitors to this
board. He tries to suck in the innocent with his sales pitch, which is
that everyone on this board is insane or delusional with the exception
of him. He seems very calm and rational at first, but be forewarned -
this man is a dangerous psychological leopard, a pure sociopath - and
here, below, is a demonstration of how he's going to treat you once you

are firmly within the grasp of his evil talons. The following message
was posted by drittemann {which is german for "devil's advocate"} in
response to a 13 YEAR OLD GIRL ASKING A QUESTION ABOUT BOTANICAL INSECT

REPELLENT, THE NIGHT BEFORE SHE WAS TO LEAVE ON A SCHOOL FIELD TRIP:
.......................................................................................................................

3. derdrittemann2...@yahoo.com
Nov 10, 5:33 pm show options

Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
From: derdrittemann2...@yahoo.com - Find messages by this author
Date: 17 Nov 2005 11:33:07 -0800
Local: Thurs, Nov 17 2005 1:33 pm
Subject: Re: What do you guys think about botanical insect repellent
lotion? I have a field trip tomorrow??Smile
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse



derdrittemann2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
it puts the lotion on its skin and it does what it is told.
it puts the lotion on its skin and it does what it is told.
IT PUTS THE LOTION ON ITS SKIN AND IT DOES WHAT IT IS TOLD!
PUT THE LOTION ON YOUR SKIN, YOU STUPID FUCKING b***h!!!
MUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH MUAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH...


.....................................................................................................................


very disturbing. many innocent and naive visitors to this board have
been terribly traumatized by drittemann's abusive and sick behavior.
You are advised to avoid interacting or even for that matter reading
dritteman's ravings.







the 3rd Man wrote:
Quote:
trong wrote:

well, I'm sorry you disagree...but I'm pretty sure "john" is more than
capable of figuring things out for himself...if you know what I
mean...

No, I do not. Please explain (this should be fascinating).


and for the umpteenth time, you're the one who firsst mentioned
the virgin mary's genitals...do you deny that?

Here's the original exchange...why don't you look through it and see
where anyone forced you to say that stuff about the Virgin Mary's
vagina?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
52 From: Yukon King - view profile
Date: Sun, Jan 1 2006 10:56 pm
Email: "Yukon King" <derdrittemann2...@yahoo.com
Groups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Remove | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author



Mockingbird wrote:
merlin wrote:

it's not about me. I'm dissecting YOUR logic on this issue. I've
previously stated that I found vaginas generally to have a grotesque
appearance, in addition to other disgusting details such as the
location precariously near the stinking dingleberry infested anus,
contamination by feces and fecal bacteria, menstrual effluent, yeast
colonies, unpleasant aromas,etc.



Sounds like he wants to pay lipservice to the concept...but is afraid
it will windup as "tongue-in-cheek".


Yes you said all that about ALL vaginas.



Yes, he did.

Presumably...including the Virgin Mary...


I don't know...but that sounds like horrible blasphemy to me.


We should probably ask Kathleen if he is going to "burn in HELL for
eternity" for that...(she knows, you see, who is going and who is
not...


...and it is by and large people who disagree with her about something
or the other).


Reply

53 From: Mockingbird - view profile
Date: Mon, Jan 2 2006 1:04 pm
Email: "Mockingbird" <mockingbirdbr...@yahoo.com
Groups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author



Yukon King wrote:
Mockingbird wrote:
merlin wrote:

it's not about me. I'm dissecting YOUR logic on this issue. I've
previously stated that I found vaginas generally to have a grotesque
appearance, in addition to other disgusting details such as the
location precariously near the stinking dingleberry infested anus,
contamination by feces and fecal bacteria, menstrual effluent, yeast
colonies, unpleasant aromas,etc.


Sounds like he wants to pay lipservice to the concept...but is afraid
it will windup as "tongue-in-cheek".



LOL


Yes you said all that about ALL vaginas.

Yes, he did.


Presumably...including the Virgin Mary...


I don't know...but that sounds like horrible blasphemy to me.


We should probably ask Kathleen if he is going to "burn in HELL for
eternity" for that...(she knows, you see, who is going and who is
not...



Funny thing about kathLOON and George W Bush and the radical right. She

rants and raves about him but acts in the same capricious high handed
illegal and self righteous manner claiming that the fight is for the
good of others and that God has blessed their fight! Just like it is
ironic that George W Bush does the very things he criticizes Osama Bin
Laden and Mullah Omar etc for doing (though he does it with the most
powerful army in the history of the world, and they do it with a few
thugs less well armed but in some ways equally if not more effective),
kathLOON is another dictator claiming to act in the service of god and
good fighting evil. Birds of a feather.


...and it is by and large people who disagree with her about something
or the other).


Yup!

Reply Rate this post: Text for clearing space
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

54 From: merlin - view profile
Date: Mon, Jan 2 2006 1:42 pm
Email: "merlin" <mockingbird...@aol.com
Groups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author



Presumably...including the Virgin Mary...
I don't know...but that sounds like horrible blasphemy to me.

TRONG:

of course, her vagina was DISGUSTING. the christian religious tradition

recognizes this fact by employing immaculate conception for it would be

unseemly for the son of god to be conceived amidst dribbling globs of
slimey love goo inside a stinking festering fecal-bacteria infested
barf bag of a hideous monstrous gonorrheal pus blob populated
unquestionably wooly super hairy nasty cunt!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
derdrittemann2003@yahoo.c
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 1799

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:28 am    Post subject: Re: WHO are YOU calling "trolls"? Reply with quote

trong wrote:

Quote:
well, I'm sorry you disagree...but I'm pretty sure "john" is more than
capable of figuring things out for himself...if you know what I
mean...

No, I do not. Please explain (this should be fascinating).


and for the umpteenth time, you're the one who firsst mentioned
Quote:
the virgin mary's genitals...do you deny that?

Here's the original exchange...why don't you look through it and see
where anyone forced you to say that stuff about the Virgin Mary's
vagina?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
52 From: Yukon King - view profile
Date: Sun, Jan 1 2006 10:56 pm
Email: "Yukon King" <derdrittemann2...@yahoo.com>
Groups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Remove | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author



Mockingbird wrote:
Quote:
merlin wrote:

it's not about me. I'm dissecting YOUR logic on this issue. I've
previously stated that I found vaginas generally to have a grotesque
appearance, in addition to other disgusting details such as the
location precariously near the stinking dingleberry infested anus,
contamination by feces and fecal bacteria, menstrual effluent, yeast
colonies, unpleasant aromas,etc.



Sounds like he wants to pay lipservice to the concept...but is afraid
it will windup as "tongue-in-cheek".


Quote:
Yes you said all that about ALL vaginas.



Yes, he did.

Presumably...including the Virgin Mary...


I don't know...but that sounds like horrible blasphemy to me.


We should probably ask Kathleen if he is going to "burn in HELL for
eternity" for that...(she knows, you see, who is going and who is
not...


....and it is by and large people who disagree with her about something
or the other).


Reply

53 From: Mockingbird - view profile
Date: Mon, Jan 2 2006 1:04 pm
Email: "Mockingbird" <mockingbirdbr...@yahoo.com>
Groups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author



Yukon King wrote:
Quote:
Mockingbird wrote:
merlin wrote:

it's not about me. I'm dissecting YOUR logic on this issue. I've
previously stated that I found vaginas generally to have a grotesque
appearance, in addition to other disgusting details such as the
location precariously near the stinking dingleberry infested anus,
contamination by feces and fecal bacteria, menstrual effluent, yeast
colonies, unpleasant aromas,etc.


Quote:
Sounds like he wants to pay lipservice to the concept...but is afraid
it will windup as "tongue-in-cheek".



LOL


Quote:
Yes you said all that about ALL vaginas.

Yes, he did.


Quote:
Presumably...including the Virgin Mary...


Quote:
I don't know...but that sounds like horrible blasphemy to me.


Quote:
We should probably ask Kathleen if he is going to "burn in HELL for
eternity" for that...(she knows, you see, who is going and who is
not...



Funny thing about kathLOON and George W Bush and the radical right. She

rants and raves about him but acts in the same capricious high handed
illegal and self righteous manner claiming that the fight is for the
good of others and that God has blessed their fight! Just like it is
ironic that George W Bush does the very things he criticizes Osama Bin
Laden and Mullah Omar etc for doing (though he does it with the most
powerful army in the history of the world, and they do it with a few
thugs less well armed but in some ways equally if not more effective),
kathLOON is another dictator claiming to act in the service of god and
good fighting evil. Birds of a feather.


Quote:
...and it is by and large people who disagree with her about something
or the other).


Yup!

Reply Rate this post: Text for clearing space
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

54 From: merlin - view profile
Date: Mon, Jan 2 2006 1:42 pm
Email: "merlin" <mockingbird...@aol.com>
Groups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author



Quote:
Presumably...including the Virgin Mary...
I don't know...but that sounds like horrible blasphemy to me.

TRONG:

of course, her vagina was DISGUSTING. the christian religious tradition

recognizes this fact by employing immaculate conception for it would be

unseemly for the son of god to be conceived amidst dribbling globs of
slimey love goo inside a stinking festering fecal-bacteria infested
barf bag of a hideous monstrous gonorrheal pus blob populated
unquestionably wooly super hairy nasty cunt!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
derdrittemann2003@yahoo.c
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 1799

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:05 am    Post subject: Re: WHO are YOU calling "trolls"? Reply with quote

trong wrote:

Quote:
well, I'm sorry you disagree...but I'm pretty sure "john" is more than
capable of figuring things out for himself...
if you know what I
mean...

Uh, no...I don't. Why don't you explain..(.this should be interesting).

and for the umpteenth time, you're the one who first mentioned
Quote:
the virgin mary's genitals...do you deny that?

ROFLMAO.

You were making horribly nauseatingly foul descriptions of the female
anatomy on a LYME DISEASE board...

....and so I asked you if that description also included the Virgin
Mary...and like a BIG, STUPID fish...you swallowed the bait...HOOK,
LINE and SINKER!

LMAO. No one put those words in your mouth. You said it...don't blame
me.

LOL. What a chump.

as far as children
Quote:
go...if you're so concerned about them, why do you continuously use
words like "f***, ass" :s**t" etc...children who want dirtiness aren't
coming to sci med lyme...there's plenty of nastiness on the
internet...your arguments are ludicrous.

Oh, Lord...you MUST be joking.

That's it? "All the other boys did it"?

How old ARE you?

The question was about where in the hell do YOU get off calling other
people TROLLS?
Back to top
eugeneshapiroisapig
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2108

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:51 am    Post subject: Re: WHO are YOU calling "trolls"? Reply with quote

well, I'm sorry you disagree...but I'm pretty sure "john" is more than
capable of figuring things out for himself...if you know what I
mean...and for the umpteenth time, you're the one who firsst mentioned
the virgin mary's genitals...do you deny that? as far as children
go...if you're so concerned about them, why do you continuously use
words like "f***, ass" :s**t" etc...children who want dirtiness aren't
coming to sci med lyme...there's plenty of nastiness on the
internet...your arguments are ludicrous.

the 3rd Man wrote:
Quote:
trong wrote:

(This is approaching comedic proportions).

WHO in the HELL do you think YOU are to call ANYONE a "troll"?

YOU post pathetic juvenile obscene garbage and filth...where children
can see it...

...you blame a "Lyme disease coverup" on "Zionist real estate
magnates"...

...you mock and insult Catholics and their faith...call them
"insane"...post a REPULSIVE, mocking and grotesque attack on of all
things...the Virgin Mary's genitals...

...you threaten to pay a "visit" to patient's homes with whom you
disagree...

...others you mock as a "cripple'...

...HOW DARE YOU?

You're a bigotted narrow-minded intolerant mysogynistic A-S-S-H-O-L-E.

But no...what pissed me off was how you treated the person requesting
help. But you have to be out of your tiny sick little mind to think
that you are being "smeared" with your own words.

You said it...all of it.
Back to top
derdrittemann2003@yahoo.c
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 1799

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:03 am    Post subject: WHO are YOU calling "trolls"? Reply with quote

trong wrote:

(This is approaching comedic proportions).

WHO in the HELL do you think YOU are to call ANYONE a "troll"?

YOU post pathetic juvenile obscene garbage and filth...where children
can see it...

....you blame a "Lyme disease coverup" on "Zionist real estate
magnates"...

....you mock and insult Catholics and their faith...call them
"insane"...post a REPULSIVE, mocking and grotesque attack on of all
things...the Virgin Mary's genitals...

....you threaten to pay a "visit" to patient's homes with whom you
disagree...

....others you mock as a "cripple'...

....HOW DARE YOU?

You're a bigotted narrow-minded intolerant mysogynistic A-S-S-H-O-L-E.

But no...what pissed me off was how you treated the person requesting
help. But you have to be out of your tiny sick little mind to think
that you are being "smeared" with your own words.

You said it...all of it.
Back to top
eugeneshapiroisapig
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2108

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:20 am    Post subject: This is what ignited the trolls Reply with quote

in a sense, late lyme disease is a genetic condition. therefore, the
presence of the disease in multiple family members may be expected in
hyperendemic regions. of course, this does not explain the presence of
disease in a spouse.

keep in mind two things: {1} the nymphal stage of the ixodes tick is
tiny, the size of this dot: {.}. also, the ability of certain insects
notably culex mosquitoes to transmit mechanically or otherwise has not
been reported in north america. it's important because the lyme we see
in north america is likely descended from crudely engineered strains
manufactured in the 50s and 60s which utilized genetic material from
certain old world relapsing fever spirochetes. why would they do this,
well it's because they knew from the 40's that certain RF borrelia in
addition to being capable of tick transmission were also able to
reproduce and establish in certain insects. mosquitoes make very good
bioweapons delivery systems. especially agressive hybrid mosquitoes.
finally, OW relapsing fever spirochetes were known to activate latent
viral infections in humans. and were also known to establish residual
brain infections and were highly neurotropic. all of these qualities
lead to the use of their genetic material in producing manufactured
strains tested on the US population. in any event, it's possible that
your family is being infected not by ticks, but by flying insects.


Andrew spielman is a gigantic liar.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Thu Jun 21, 2018 12:38 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » diseases » lyme
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts "Aligondo Bruce" speaking truth about trolls Nutcracker lyme 5 Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:34 pm
No new posts SueSue the grape cutter and other Trolls W_B dentistry 3 Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:35 am
No new posts HOW TO DEFEAT THE TROLLS Chuck P Adams lyme 10 Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:43 pm
No new posts note to s.m.v. trolls William Stacy vision 4 Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:55 pm
No new posts Tired of the Trolls? www.britishnurse.com nursing 0 Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:42 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: email marketing campaigns , electronics forum, Science forum, Unix/Linux blog, Unix/Linux documentation, Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0200s ][ Queries: 20 (0.0022s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]