FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » diseases » cancer
Revici was right...Darwin was wrong
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [6 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Steph
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 504

PostPosted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:49 am    Post subject: Re: Revici was right...Darwin was wrong Reply with quote

<awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151608211.603858.32750@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Quote:

Steph wrote:
awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151590429.805570.175830@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Steph wrote:
awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151538683.906553.47260@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
The linked website provides solid evidence of the validity of
Revici's
Theory of Evolution otherwise known as Hierarchic Organization.

Oftentimes, in any controversy there is evidence on either side. But
every once in a while, along comes irrefutable proof that resolves
the
argument. Such is the case with the Grayfield microscope, a German
microscope that can show a LIVING VIRUS!

The website has a downloadable video (if you have a highspeed
connection) of a LIVING VIRUS in LIVING COLOR transforming into a
bacteria. Revici said viruses transformed into bacteria as an
evolutionary process, and that bacteria had a natural defense
against
viruses.


A virus "transforming" into a bacterium (a bacterium, not a bacteria,
Kel)
is about as likely as a mushroom transforming into a puppy.

Let me see...which is more important...I misspell the Latin singular
and plural of bacterium/bacteria and you are misinformed about
evolution? Hmm...and your answer indicates you based your answer on a
'theory' instead of looking at the evidence.

When you actually look at the evidence, get back to me. Meanwhile,
STFU, because you have nothing to offer other than superstition and
wishful thinking.



Childishly classy as always...........

Waah! You made a childishly classly crack about being ashamed and yet
you cry about getting your ass handed back to you...

why... because you have still haven't reviewed the evidence.

So, STFU until you have something more than superstition and wishful
thinking.


Oh dear. Back in the killfile for you again..........
Back to top
awthrawthr@yahoo.com
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 122

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Revici was right...Darwin was wrong Reply with quote

Steph wrote:
Quote:
awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151590429.805570.175830@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Steph wrote:
awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151538683.906553.47260@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
The linked website provides solid evidence of the validity of Revici's
Theory of Evolution otherwise known as Hierarchic Organization.

Oftentimes, in any controversy there is evidence on either side. But
every once in a while, along comes irrefutable proof that resolves the
argument. Such is the case with the Grayfield microscope, a German
microscope that can show a LIVING VIRUS!

The website has a downloadable video (if you have a highspeed
connection) of a LIVING VIRUS in LIVING COLOR transforming into a
bacteria. Revici said viruses transformed into bacteria as an
evolutionary process, and that bacteria had a natural defense against
viruses.


A virus "transforming" into a bacterium (a bacterium, not a bacteria,
Kel)
is about as likely as a mushroom transforming into a puppy.

Let me see...which is more important...I misspell the Latin singular
and plural of bacterium/bacteria and you are misinformed about
evolution? Hmm...and your answer indicates you based your answer on a
'theory' instead of looking at the evidence.

When you actually look at the evidence, get back to me. Meanwhile,
STFU, because you have nothing to offer other than superstition and
wishful thinking.



Childishly classy as always...........

Waah! You made a childishly classly crack about being ashamed and yet
you cry about getting your ass handed back to you...

why... because you have still haven't reviewed the evidence.

So, STFU until you have something more than superstition and wishful
thinking.
Back to top
Steph
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 504

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Revici was right...Darwin was wrong Reply with quote

<awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151590429.805570.175830@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Quote:

Steph wrote:
awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151538683.906553.47260@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
The linked website provides solid evidence of the validity of Revici's
Theory of Evolution otherwise known as Hierarchic Organization.

Oftentimes, in any controversy there is evidence on either side. But
every once in a while, along comes irrefutable proof that resolves the
argument. Such is the case with the Grayfield microscope, a German
microscope that can show a LIVING VIRUS!

The website has a downloadable video (if you have a highspeed
connection) of a LIVING VIRUS in LIVING COLOR transforming into a
bacteria. Revici said viruses transformed into bacteria as an
evolutionary process, and that bacteria had a natural defense against
viruses.


A virus "transforming" into a bacterium (a bacterium, not a bacteria,
Kel)
is about as likely as a mushroom transforming into a puppy.

Let me see...which is more important...I misspell the Latin singular
and plural of bacterium/bacteria and you are misinformed about
evolution? Hmm...and your answer indicates you based your answer on a
'theory' instead of looking at the evidence.

When you actually look at the evidence, get back to me. Meanwhile,
STFU, because you have nothing to offer other than superstition and
wishful thinking.



Childishly classy as always...........
Back to top
awthrawthr@yahoo.com
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 122

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Revici was right...Darwin was wrong Reply with quote

Steph wrote:
Quote:
awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151538683.906553.47260@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
The linked website provides solid evidence of the validity of Revici's
Theory of Evolution otherwise known as Hierarchic Organization.

Oftentimes, in any controversy there is evidence on either side. But
every once in a while, along comes irrefutable proof that resolves the
argument. Such is the case with the Grayfield microscope, a German
microscope that can show a LIVING VIRUS!

The website has a downloadable video (if you have a highspeed
connection) of a LIVING VIRUS in LIVING COLOR transforming into a
bacteria. Revici said viruses transformed into bacteria as an
evolutionary process, and that bacteria had a natural defense against
viruses.


A virus "transforming" into a bacterium (a bacterium, not a bacteria, Kel)
is about as likely as a mushroom transforming into a puppy.

Let me see...which is more important...I misspell the Latin singular
and plural of bacterium/bacteria and you are misinformed about
evolution? Hmm...and your answer indicates you based your answer on a
'theory' instead of looking at the evidence.

When you actually look at the evidence, get back to me. Meanwhile,
STFU, because you have nothing to offer other than superstition and
wishful thinking.

Quote:

With this microscope, Darwinianism is dead. (No aspersion against
Charles Darwin is intended...he was a sincere investigator...and there
is no shame in being incorrect.)


And we all know you feel no shame.
Back to top
Steph
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 504

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:19 am    Post subject: Re: Revici was right...Darwin was wrong Reply with quote

<awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151538683.906553.47260@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
The linked website provides solid evidence of the validity of Revici's
Theory of Evolution otherwise known as Hierarchic Organization.

Oftentimes, in any controversy there is evidence on either side. But
every once in a while, along comes irrefutable proof that resolves the
argument. Such is the case with the Grayfield microscope, a German
microscope that can show a LIVING VIRUS!

The website has a downloadable video (if you have a highspeed
connection) of a LIVING VIRUS in LIVING COLOR transforming into a
bacteria. Revici said viruses transformed into bacteria as an
evolutionary process, and that bacteria had a natural defense against
viruses.


A virus "transforming" into a bacterium (a bacterium, not a bacteria, Kel)
is about as likely as a mushroom transforming into a puppy.

Quote:
With this microscope, Darwinianism is dead. (No aspersion against
Charles Darwin is intended...he was a sincere investigator...and there
is no shame in being incorrect.)


And we all know you feel no shame.
Back to top
awthrawthr@yahoo.com
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 122

PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:51 pm    Post subject: Revici was right...Darwin was wrong Reply with quote

The linked website provides solid evidence of the validity of Revici's
Theory of Evolution otherwise known as Hierarchic Organization.

Oftentimes, in any controversy there is evidence on either side. But
every once in a while, along comes irrefutable proof that resolves the
argument. Such is the case with the Grayfield microscope, a German
microscope that can show a LIVING VIRUS!

The website has a downloadable video (if you have a highspeed
connection) of a LIVING VIRUS in LIVING COLOR transforming into a
bacteria. Revici said viruses transformed into bacteria as an
evolutionary process, and that bacteria had a natural defense against
viruses.

With this microscope, Darwinianism is dead. (No aspersion against
Charles Darwin is intended...he was a sincere investigator...and there
is no shame in being incorrect.)

Revici was right. Again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grayfield technology is like Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), but in
color and with variable depth of field, without the need for coatings
or vacuums. Now you can monitor live tissue under the microscope with
magnifications in excess of 25,000 times with a resolution of better
than 100nm with variable depth of field, with sharp contours.

Benefits of real life microscopy
While other microscopes at such high resolutions deliver images in an
unnatural, black and white, Grayfield technology provides the
researcher:
real (natural) color.

Please view our online video, or order the DVD from the Grayfield Store
to really see for yourself, the exceptional images capable with these
Grayfield Technology devices.

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice,
in practice there is"

http://www.Grayfieldoptical.com
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [6 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:29 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » diseases » cancer
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Another small Revici success awthrawthr@yahoo.com cancer 0 Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 am
No new posts Could my new prescription be wrong? msswasstastic@aol.com vision 4 Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:51 am
No new posts Revici's Corrollary Melissa Revici cancer 5 Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:48 pm
No new posts Brenner's views on the Revici method pmoran@bordernet.com.au cancer 14 Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:37 am
No new posts New journal article update to the WRONG LYME VACCINE stor... Newsgroup Leader Katheen lyme 1 Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:42 am

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: email marketing campaigns , electronics forum, Science forum, Unix/Linux blog, Unix/Linux documentation, Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0226s ][ Queries: 20 (0.0028s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]