Neil Brooks has been banned from VISF by Hanwen

Doogle · medicine forum beginner Joined: 01 Apr 2006 Posts: 7

Thank goodness as discussions about NVI can finally progress w/o this
psychotic clown disrupting everthing.

Dragon28 · medicine forum beginner Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 24

Doogle wrote:

p.clarkii@gmail.com · medicine forum Guru Wannabe Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 247

Why do you think anybody here cares about what goes on in your crazy
NVI discussion forum?

Go away.

Neil probably went there as a counterbalance against Otis Brown. Otis
NEEDS a counterbalance. He spreads lies and misinformation and
actually can harm people. If you guys don't care, then just continue
your sungazing and other b.s. and stay away from here.

============

Doogle wrote:

Rand0m · medicine forum beginner Joined: 21 Feb 2006 Posts: 2

Dragon28 wrote:

Odis S. Brown · medicine forum beginner Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Posts: 32

Dear Dragon,

Subject: Neil D. Brooks and YaBB site

I do, indeed, think Neil D. Brooks is psychotic, a living
example of "stair-case hyperopia," unemployed
AND unemployable and feel no loss in his banishment
from the "second-opinion" YaBB site.

Retinula was CLEARLY INcorrect. Because you are trying
to find alternative means to improve your vision (the
"second-opinion") you obviously DO want to be lied to,
presented with disproven ideas, and to hear (thousands
or times) tales of dead doctors who never worked in
optometry or ophthalmology. You also DO NOT want
to hear simple, effective, and safe solutions to accom-
modative spasm (like periocular warming).

That much is clear.

It is also clear that--with Neil D. Brooks out of the way--
you are MINE to do with as I please. Unopposed and
unchallenged.

So, ...

back to dishonesty and unabashed lying

back to deception, evasion, and avoidance

back to attacking doctors and scaring children

back to lying about statistics that, frankly, I do not
understand myself

back to selling books and to helping Steve Leung
sell books

back to helping Fred Deakins sell products

back to helping -- well, nobody -- with their vision

back to risking your stable binocular vision for my
warped agenda

back to ignoring all recent studies that contradict my
closely-held beliefs

back to spouting 1890's books written when leeches
were used for most maladies

back to telling you that Oakley-Young PROVES that
the minus lens causes stair-case myopia, even though
it clearly doesn't

back to talking about my 20/20 nephew, Keith, but
NOT about my visually impaired niece, Joy, both of
whom I treated the exact same way

back to the dark ages when (oh, sweet bliss) the sun
and the planets revolved around the (delightfully flat)
Earth.

Nobody to bother us now, Eli. Perhaps now, Doogle
and I can start that family that we spent moonlit nights
dreaming about.

Yes, indeed. Life is good over at the "second-opion"
site!

Best,

Odis
Self-Appointed Cult Leader

On 22 Jun 2006 05:25:01 -0700, "Dragon28" <280388@walla.co.il> wrote:

Dr. Leukoma · medicine forum Guru Joined: 30 Apr 2005 Posts: 1283

odisbrown@pa.net wrote:

Odis S. Brown · medicine forum beginner Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Posts: 32

Dear Dr. Leukoma:

Subject: my ancestry

DrLeukoma> LOL! Are you related to Odis Day
and the Nights?

odis> Oh, Doc...

You know you make me want to SHOUT!

Best,

Odis
Axe man

otisbrown@pa.net · medicine forum Guru Joined: 24 Mar 2005 Posts: 1447

Correction: Odis is not OTIS.

If you wish to understand the COMPETENT second-opinion
read:

www.chinamyopia.org

And for my support for this PREVENTIVE second opinion read:

www.myopiafree.com

Best,

Otis

Odis S. Brown · medicine forum beginner Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Posts: 32

On 22 Jun 2006 08:51:37 -0700, "otisbrown@pa.net" <otisbrown@pa.net>
wrote:

If, on the other hand, you wish to understand my
PATHOLOGY, plesae read:

http://www.psychologynet.org/dsm.html

Best,

Odis
Looo-hoo-hoo-hooo-natic

Dr. Leukoma · medicine forum Guru Joined: 30 Apr 2005 Posts: 1283

odisbrown@pa.net wrote:

p.clarkii@gmail.com · medicine forum Guru Wannabe Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 247

I wouldn't describe that website, or your ideas, as "competent" by any
means. just go away back to your freako private bulletin board.

---------------

otisbrown@pa.net wrote:

Google