FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Medicine forums » cardiology
Question for Chung
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 3 [31 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  1, 2, 3 Next
Author Message
Al
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 385

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 8:37 pm    Post subject: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion?
Back to top
Kumar
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 870

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 4:28 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly
no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to
different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self
interests and requirements etc.

As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want
to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger
respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense?

One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.
Back to top
The Lord
medicine forum addict


Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:41 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Quote:
In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc.
As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want

to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger
respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense?
One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.



----nominated, "Psychobabble Non-Answer of the Year, 2006"
Back to top
Kumar
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 870

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:50 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

The Lord wrote:
Quote:
In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc.
As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want
to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger
respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense?
One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.



----nominated, "Psychobabble Non-Answer of the Year, 2006"

Repeat;

One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.
Back to top
panamfloyd@hotmail.com
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 109

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 5:56 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Kumar wrote:
Quote:
The Lord wrote:
In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc.
As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want
to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger
respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense?
One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.



----nominated, "Psychobabble Non-Answer of the Year, 2006"

Repeat;

One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.

Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course.
Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of
historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected
in the subjugation arena.

-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
Back to top
The Lord
medicine forum addict


Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 6:01 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Quote:
Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course. Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected in the subjugation arena.

Agreed. This is self-evident; yet, paradoxically, this is reversed on
alternate Tuesdays.
Back to top
Kumar
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 870

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 6:13 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Kumar wrote:
The Lord wrote:
In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc.
As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want
to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger
respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense?
One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.



----nominated, "Psychobabble Non-Answer of the Year, 2006"

Repeat;

One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.

Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course.
Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of
historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected
in the subjugation arena.

-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html

These words or shown pictures are indirect and complex for me.
Back to top
panamfloyd@hotmail.com
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 109

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 6:31 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

The Lord wrote:
Quote:
Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course. Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected in the subjugation arena.

Agreed. This is self-evident; yet, paradoxically, this is reversed on
alternate Tuesdays.

Absolutely. High-flying family fun on several planes of detail!

-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
Back to top
panamfloyd@hotmail.com
medicine forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 109

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 6:50 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Kumar wrote:
Quote:
panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote:
Kumar wrote:
The Lord wrote:
In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc.
As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want
to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger
respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense?
One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.



----nominated, "Psychobabble Non-Answer of the Year, 2006"

Repeat;

One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and
"said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time
and language change. Best.

Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course.
Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of
historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected
in the subjugation arena.

-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html

These words or shown pictures are indirect and complex for me.

Yer a `bot, ain't cha? Did I get ya?
-PF
Back to top
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 8540

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 11:22 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Al wrote:
Quote:
Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion?

I don't answer questions about religion.

Would be glad to answer any questions your may have about Christianity.

Still praying for your endangered soul, dear Al.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/jjl29
Back to top
Al
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 385

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 11:44 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Quote:
Al wrote:
Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion?

I don't answer questions about religion.

Would be glad to answer any questions your may have about Christianity.


Quote:

Aaaaaahhhhh ... yet another evasive bullshit answer from Chung...
Back to top
Al
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 385

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 11:44 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Kumar wrote:
Quote:
In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly
no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to
different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self
interests and requirements etc.


Another frigging whacko, IMHO
Back to top
nospam7@heartmdphd.com
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 470

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 1:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Al wrote:
Quote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Al wrote:
Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion?

I don't answer questions about religion.

Would be glad to answer any questions you may have about Christianity.

Aaaaaahhhhh ... yet another evasive bullshit answer from Chung...

Sorry the truth continues to bother you so terribly. Please forgive
all my iniquities.

Still praying for your endangered soul, dear Al.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/jjl29
Back to top
Al
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 385

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 4:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Quote:

Would be glad to answer any questions you may have about Christianity.
Aaaaaahhhhh ... yet another evasive bullshit answer from Chung...

Sorry the truth continues to bother you so terribly. Please forgive
all my iniquities.



AND ANOTHER!!!
Back to top
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 8540

PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 2:44 am    Post subject: Re: Question for Chung Reply with quote

Al wrote:
Quote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Would be glad to answer any questions you may have about Christianity.

Aaaaaahhhhh ... yet another evasive bullshit answer from Chung...

Sorry the truth continues to bother you so terribly. Please forgive
all my iniquities.

AND ANOTHER!!!

Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/jjl29
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 3 [31 Posts] Goto page:  1, 2, 3 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:30 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Medicine forums » cardiology
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts question about eye exams and what the... bruin70@mail.com vision 0 Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:20 am
No new posts Question about Pupillary Dilation Tes... nickname vision 3 Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:46 pm
No new posts Dumb question about food stryped@hotmail.com nutrition 5 Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:07 pm
No new posts Nicotine question frenchy dentistry 3 Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:00 pm
No new posts Diuretic Question Robert11 cardiology 5 Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:21 pm

Debt Consolidation | Money News | Buy Anything On eBay | Debt Consolidation | Tesco
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: electronics forum, Science forum Unix/Linux blog Unix/Linux documentation Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.2061s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0820s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]