|
|
| Author |
Message |
SkumTaht
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
 Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:06 pm Post subject:
Chung
|
|
|
|
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
napolius
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:47 am Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
SkumTaht wrote:
| Quote: | He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
|
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-( |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
R. Pierce Butler
medicine forum addict
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 86
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 9:08 am Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
| Quote: | SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
|
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
napolius
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 11:23 am Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
| Quote: | napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung.
|
apart from his bullshit, Chung never fails to answer medical questions.
That's preferable than the quadruple load of bull that erupts from the
numerous commentators he grabs by the balls.
You guys should see yourselves.. chung's sock puppets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cardinal Numbaz
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 3:33 pm Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
napolius wrote:
| Quote: | R. Pierce Butler wrote:
napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung.
apart from his bullshit, Chung never fails to answer medical questions.
That's preferable than the quadruple load of bull that erupts from the
numerous commentators he grabs by the balls.
You guys should see yourselves.. chung's sock puppets.
|
Chung is the one that both poisons legitimate threads with his nonsense
and crossposts irrelevant threads from genuine religious newsgroups
without the permission of the OP. All we do is rebut his nonsense when
it has been crossposted to non-religious newsgroups as a deliberate
provocation and in violation of their charter.
As to his 'advice', It is invariably amazingly glib for somebody
claiming to be a qualified and practising cardiolgist. It amounts in
most cases to faintly informed common sense of the sort one's GP might
deliver if they were on a very tight time slot. Take it from somebody
who has a large amount of experience in the field of clinical
governance.
Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SkumTaht
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 3:46 pm Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
| Quote: | Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty.
|
Yeah, I wondered about that. Usually you wouldn't get anyone in any professionaly related field posting info
and advice in newsgroups, let alone medical. I thought he would have asked them to contact him, or to seek
urgent advice from their own doctor/specialist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
napolius
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 4:22 pm Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
Pastor Kutchie wrote:
| Quote: | napolius wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung.
apart from his bullshit, Chung never fails to answer medical questions.
That's preferable than the quadruple load of bull that erupts from the
numerous commentators he grabs by the balls.
You guys should see yourselves.. chung's sock puppets.
Chung is the one that both poisons legitimate threads with his nonsense
and crossposts irrelevant threads from genuine religious newsgroups
without the permission of the OP. All we do is rebut his nonsense when
it has been crossposted to non-religious newsgroups as a deliberate
provocation and in violation of their charter.
As to his 'advice', It is invariably amazingly glib for somebody
claiming to be a qualified and practising cardiolgist. It amounts in
most cases to faintly informed common sense of the sort one's GP might
deliver if they were on a very tight time slot. Take it from somebody
who has a large amount of experience in the field of clinical
governance.
Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty.
|
why are you guys so neurotic ?
Face up to it : you got a thing about
Chung that borders on insanity |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
napolius
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 4:25 pm Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
SkumTaht wrote:
| Quote: |
Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty.
Yeah, I wondered about that. Usually you wouldn't get anyone in any professionaly related field posting info
and advice in newsgroups, let alone medical. I thought he would have asked them to contact him, or to seek
urgent advice from their own doctor/specialist.
|
In general, Chung measures his comments extremely carefully,
limiting himself to dishing out information rather than advice,
except for his advice about god, that is ;)
Check his posts, how often does he end his comments with
the one piece of medical advice which he allows himself :
"go see your doctor about this" ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 8540
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 6:46 pm Post subject:
Proof of the Power of Praying in Jesus' name.
|
|
|
napolius wrote:
| Quote: | Pastor Kutchie wrote:
napolius wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung.
apart from his bullshit, Chung never fails to answer medical questions.
That's preferable than the quadruple load of bull that erupts from the
numerous commentators he grabs by the balls.
You guys should see yourselves.. chung's sock puppets.
Chung is the one that both poisons legitimate threads with his nonsense
and crossposts irrelevant threads from genuine religious newsgroups
without the permission of the OP. All we do is rebut his nonsense when
it has been crossposted to non-religious newsgroups as a deliberate
provocation and in violation of their charter.
As to his 'advice', It is invariably amazingly glib for somebody
claiming to be a qualified and practising cardiolgist. It amounts in
most cases to faintly informed common sense of the sort one's GP might
deliver if they were on a very tight time slot. Take it from somebody
who has a large amount of experience in the field of clinical
governance.
Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty.
why are you guys so neurotic ?
Face up to it : you got a thing about
Chung that borders on insanity
|
What you have been witnessing is the effect that powerful blessings
from GOD have on the unrepentent who refuse to turn to GOD to receive
HIS blessings properly. Ultimately, these blessings will slay such
unrepentent folks.
Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cardinal Numbaz
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:08 pm Post subject:
Re: Proof of the Power of Praying in Jesus' name.
|
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
| Quote: | Ultimately, these blessings will slay such
unrepentent folks.
|
Thanks for the conclusive proof, if proof be needed, Mr Chung, that
Christianity, at least your brand of it, is a death cult. I graciously
accept your concession of defeat in this whole debate. Count yourself
lucky I don't take these things more personally. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cardinal Numbaz
medicine forum Guru
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 323
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:16 pm Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
napolius deposited the following s**t stain in sci.med.cardiology:
| Quote: | Pastor Kutchie wrote:
napolius wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung.
apart from his bullshit, Chung never fails to answer medical questions.
That's preferable than the quadruple load of bull that erupts from the
numerous commentators he grabs by the balls.
You guys should see yourselves.. chung's sock puppets.
Chung is the one that both poisons legitimate threads with his nonsense
and crossposts irrelevant threads from genuine religious newsgroups
without the permission of the OP. All we do is rebut his nonsense when
it has been crossposted to non-religious newsgroups as a deliberate
provocation and in violation of their charter.
As to his 'advice', It is invariably amazingly glib for somebody
claiming to be a qualified and practising cardiolgist. It amounts in
most cases to faintly informed common sense of the sort one's GP might
deliver if they were on a very tight time slot. Take it from somebody
who has a large amount of experience in the field of clinical
governance.
Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty.
why are you guys so neurotic ?
Face up to it : you got a thing about
Chung that borders on insanity
|
And exactly why are you making it YOUR business, Monsieur Troll? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hugh Jarse
medicine forum addict
Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 59
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:24 pm Post subject:
Re: Proof of the Power of Praying in Jesus' name.
|
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
| Quote: | napolius wrote:
Pastor Kutchie wrote:
napolius wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung.
apart from his bullshit, Chung never fails to answer medical questions.
That's preferable than the quadruple load of bull that erupts from the
numerous commentators he grabs by the balls.
You guys should see yourselves.. chung's sock puppets.
Chung is the one that both poisons legitimate threads with his nonsense
and crossposts irrelevant threads from genuine religious newsgroups
without the permission of the OP. All we do is rebut his nonsense when
it has been crossposted to non-religious newsgroups as a deliberate
provocation and in violation of their charter.
As to his 'advice', It is invariably amazingly glib for somebody
claiming to be a qualified and practising cardiolgist. It amounts in
most cases to faintly informed common sense of the sort one's GP might
deliver if they were on a very tight time slot. Take it from somebody
who has a large amount of experience in the field of clinical
governance.
Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty.
why are you guys so neurotic ?
Face up to it : you got a thing about
Chung that borders on insanity
What you have been witnessing is the effect that powerful blessings
from GOD have on the unrepentent who refuse to turn to GOD to receive
HIS blessings properly. Ultimately, these blessings will slay such
unrepentent folks.
|
What you're witnessing is payback for some three years of unrepentant
abuse of Usenet by this increasingly psychotic failed doctor. Witness
the wording of his divine threat and anticipate the denial of personal
responsibility for it that will swiftly follow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
napolius
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 8:53 pm Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
Pastor Kutchie wrote:
| Quote: | napolius deposited the following s**t stain in sci.med.cardiology:
Pastor Kutchie wrote:
napolius wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
napolius <heliosyn@tata.net> wrote in news:447019c7$0$19720$8fcfb975
@news.wanadoo.fr:
SkumTaht wrote:
He made 1524 posts in April 2006, I wonder how many of them were religious
Happily those of us who ask for help usually get medical advice
along with Dr. Chung's homily... I can't say the same for the
tens of thousand of posts by people who hog sci/med/cardiology
talking only about the homily
:-(
and occasionally one gets a double load of bullshit from Chung.
apart from his bullshit, Chung never fails to answer medical questions.
That's preferable than the quadruple load of bull that erupts from the
numerous commentators he grabs by the balls.
You guys should see yourselves.. chung's sock puppets.
Chung is the one that both poisons legitimate threads with his nonsense
and crossposts irrelevant threads from genuine religious newsgroups
without the permission of the OP. All we do is rebut his nonsense when
it has been crossposted to non-religious newsgroups as a deliberate
provocation and in violation of their charter.
As to his 'advice', It is invariably amazingly glib for somebody
claiming to be a qualified and practising cardiolgist. It amounts in
most cases to faintly informed common sense of the sort one's GP might
deliver if they were on a very tight time slot. Take it from somebody
who has a large amount of experience in the field of clinical
governance.
Ask yourself why a qualified cardiologist is dishing out ad-hoc and
generalised advice on the internet. The best advice to take from him,
which he does often give, is to consult one's own doctor. If only he
repeated that as catechistically as he does his parroted excuses for
being nasty.
why are you guys so neurotic ?
Face up to it : you got a thing about
Chung that borders on insanity
And exactly why are you making it YOUR business, Monsieur Troll?
|
I hate clutter.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
napolius
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 8:56 pm Post subject:
Re: Proof of the Power of Praying in Jesus' name.
|
|
|
The Rev Dr Hugh Jarse NLAHN wrote:
| Quote: |
What you're witnessing is payback for some three years of unrepentant
abuse of Usenet by this increasingly psychotic failed doctor. Witness
the wording of his divine threat and anticipate the denial of personal
responsibility for it that will swiftly follow.
|
Newsgroups are full of geeks and their pet hates. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
napolius
medicine forum beginner
Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 8:57 pm Post subject:
Re: Chung
|
|
|
Pastor Kutchie wrote:
| Quote: |
why are you guys so neurotic ?
Face up to it : you got a thing about
Chung that borders on insanity
And exactly why are you making it YOUR business, Monsieur Troll?
|
What's a cure for a neurosis ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:35 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Mortgages | Guitar Books | Graphics Cards & Monitors | Credit Counseling | Bad Credit Mortgages
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
electronics forum,
Science forum
Unix/Linux blog
Unix/Linux documentation
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Medicine forums
»
cardiology
