Dear International Criminal Court...

smagruder10@yahoo.com · medicine forum Guru Wannabe Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 123

http://actionlyme.org/ICC_22_NOV_05.htm

International Criminal Court
22 November 2005

Maanweg, 174

http://actionlyme.org
2516 AB, The Hague
The Netherlands

Tel: + 31 (0)70 515 8515
Fax: +31 (0)70 515 8555

A QUESTION OF TERRORISM OR PATRIOTISM

European Commission

Hearing Office
Rue de la Loi 200
J79 - 05/211
B-1049 Brussels

+32 (0)2 296.95.78

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Fax: + 41 22 917 9022

+41 22 917 9011

Dear Sirs,

If George W, Bush and Richard Cheney have defrauded the US citizens,
and the world, and attacked Iraq illegally, and for the USA to declare
Jose Padilla and Ahmed Ali (below) terrorists, and plotters against the
USA, is it not true that they are patriots for the US, the world, or at
least Iraq?

Because according to USA law, the terms of treason are:

Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in
levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them
aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the
testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in
open court.

"Levying war against them." That is the same as 1) removing our
civil rights under the Patriot Act, 2) making us susceptible to attacks
by fraudulently making a case for war in Iraq, and against the advise
of the UN, and 3) selling out our economy for private interests
including their own family and personal oil and oil company
investments, 4) destroying our economy and while speaking about "no
child left behind," Bush *meant* no future blue collar ignoramus left
out of the subjugation and war machine,

Betraying the common wealth,

"Giving aid and comfort to our enemies" would sort of be like 5)
sending all our men and equipment to Iraq, ignoring Korea, putting us
at risk and making other such related stupid decisions, 6) arresting
war dissenters, and calling them traitors, 7) lying to us, lying about
what his bills (selling out Medicaid and Social Security) would do, and
Cool

trying to frighten us into believing we need this war....:

Washington Post

US citizen faces terrorism trial after 3½ years in custody
Guardian Unlimited - 23 minutes ago
Jose Padilla, a US citizen held without charge for more than three
years after being accused of planning to detonate a radioactive "dirty
bomb" in a large American city, was yesterday indicted on the lesser
charges of conspiring to "murder, kidnap and ...
Dirty Bomb Suspect Padilla Indicted San Francisco Chronicle
Newsview: White House shifts on combatants Seattle Post Intelligencer
San Jose Mercury News - Washington Post - Reuters - San Diego Union
Tribune - all 627 related »

BBC News

Would-be Bush assassin could face life
CNN International - 1 hour ago
Ashraf Nubani, an attorney for Ahmed Abu Ali, enters the US District
Court on Tuesday. ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (CNN) -- A federal jury
convicted a Virginia man Tuesday of joining the al Qaeda terrorist
network and conspiring to assassinate President Bush. ...
Suspect in assassination plot convicted Seattle Post Intelligencer
US Citizen Found Guilty of Plotting to Kill Bush (Update2) Bloomberg
WVEC.com (subscription) - Xinhua - CNN - CBS News - all 330 related »

========

No one is suggesting that assassinating someone is the correct or sane
course of action. Indeed, think of how many of Saddam Hussein's
cabinet and staff and family have been assassinated in this illegal
occupation, and I absolutely do not advocate the murder of anyone, from
abortion to euthanasia - including putting ourselves out of the
misery of Bush and Cheney.

But if it is technically treason to be giving aid and comfort to the
enemy, and in this case it would be Americans giving aid and comfort to
the Mossad by 1) allowing the World Trade Center buildings to be
pre-loaded with explosives and not forewarning us or intercepting the
flying bombs on September 11, 2001. 2) Then attacking Iraq to go
after the "terrorists who have Weapons of Mass Destruction," which
isn't true, and we know it wasn't true because of the Downing
Street Memo where "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around
the policy" and the "sexed-up dossier" which was sexed up by
Number 10 Downing Street, London, and 3) that Bush stated in debates
before he wasn't elected the first time his intent to "handle"
Saddam (Oct 2000, debating Al Gore, Jim Lehrer moderator):

BUSH: "It's also important to keep strong ties in the Middle East,
credible ties, because of the energy crisis we're now in. After all, a
lot of the energy is produced from the Middle East."

BUSH: Well, I think -- it's hard to tell. I think that, you know, I
would hope to be able to convince people I could handle the Iraqi
situation better. I mean, we don't...

LEHRER: Saddam Hussein, you mean?

BUSH: Yes.

LEHRER: You could get him out of there?

BUSH: I'd like to, of course. And I presume this administration would
as well. But we don't know. There's no inspectors now in Iraq. The
coalition that was in place isn't as strong as it used to be. He is a
danger.

BUSH: We don't want him fishing in troubled waters in the Middle East.
And it's going to be hard to -- it's going to be important to rebuild
that coalition to keep the pressure on him.

LEHRER: Do you feel that is a failure of the Clinton administration?

BUSH: I do.

Clearly Bush is expressing his intent as regards Iraq: Fraud and Mass
Murder for Oil. It's hard for me, as an American and pacifist, to
say that Padilla or Ali are truly guilty of a crime, if the crime was
against a criminal regime, and criminal by our own treason standards-
Cheney and Bush.

This is also a criminal regime by Geneva Convention standards, eg., 1)
use of White Phosphorus in Iraq, 2) selling or giving Saddam Hussein
chemical and biological weapons to use against Iran, 3) exporting
torture and CIA "black sites," 4) the Abu Ghraib and Afghanistan
prisoner abuses, etc and we don't even know what other human rights
crimes there are, but surely we have committed them, if they exist.
(We abuse children in the Connecticut children's prisons, and this
does not ever seem to cease.)

I tend to believe that these gentlemen, if they are indeed guilty (and
we will never know because of the torture business and forced
confessions), have a mitigated case, although the Bush Administration
has not yet been charged with war crimes and treason.

For if Bush and Cheney were charged with treason, then the one
gentlemen, Ali, would not be terrorist, but rightfully protecting his
country, under the new Arab distinction of terrorism being against
one's own people. Under that definition Padilla might be guilty of
intending violence against his own people, as was Timothy McVeigh and
Ted Kaszynski, although Padilla never committed the act. In fact, I
was falsely compared to Ted Kaszynski and was falsely criminally
charged with intending to be like Ted Kaszynski, and I was falsely
criminally charged with intending to kill, but that insanity was
authored by a completely insane attorney who works for the State of CT.
(Surely you have investigators and can discover if I have a criminal
history, or a human rights activism history?) We clearly have plenty of
criminally insane attorneys: 1) our Attorneys General, Alberto Gonzales
and John Ashcroft, invented that we could have a new Geneva Convention
distinction for people who resist a fraudulent occupation, 2) and as
regards the fraudulent Mossad explosives in the WTC case for war, the
head of the USDOJ's Criminal Division, who is now head of Homeland
Security (Michael Chertoff), interfered with investigations as regards
9/11 and the World Trade Center. Therefore attorneys in the United
States selectively prosecute crime, commit crime, and invent crime.

Although I don't agree with violence, I also don't agree with
planned violence, such as pre-loading the World Trade Center buildings
with explosives, and sexing up dossiers as regards a 45 minute
biological or chemical warhead being placed on a missile when there
were no chemical or biological weapons in Iraq, with the exclusion of
what we gave or sold Iraq to use against Iran, or that we used against
the Iraqi people in this present war. Thus, if Iraq did have such
weapons, they came from us anyway and were illegal to use, sell and
distribute- the same crime the "war on terror" is about.

Can you help with this confusion?

As you can see, we have no one to ask for guidance. Our Department of
Justice is corrupt. What I would like to see is the Arabs bring their
grievances before the World Court, as regards Israel and real estate
and acts of aggression by both sides, which are unresolved. For
instance, if both countries agree that the previous violence against
each other was legitimate defense and not terrorism, then those acts
are not to be dealt with punitively, but we can go forward and settle
the issue of real estate in the Holy Land. Muslim religious scholars
have made the argument that all of us are sons of the 12 tribes of
Israel; Moses, Muhammed, and Christ. God gave Moses the "Thou Shalt
Not Kill," and "Thou Shalt not Commit Fraud" commandments. By
implication, those are global rules.

Can you, in your capacity, prioritize this real estate and religion
issue due to the current global instability? What happened to the
World Trade Center buildings? That was the incident that caused the
instability. Steven E. Jones, PhD., at BrighamYoung University, Provo,
Utah, asked for video footage and metal samples. This will allow him
to calculate speed and temperatures, which could confirm that the
buildings fell due to controlled demolition with explosives and an
agent that burns at higher temperatures than jet fuel. He was laughed
off by MSNBC's Tucker Carlson - who is a complete jerk by anyone's
terms - and who made references to tin foil on Dr. Jones' head, which
is what we call "Swift-Boating," in the USA. Jones is brilliant,
so he was declared crazy.

Kathleen M. Dickson

23 Garden Street

Pawcatuck, CT USA 06379

860-599-5451

Google