FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Medicine forums » General talk
Prostatitis questions
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 141 of 143 [2136 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, ..., 139, 140, 141, 142, 143 Next
Author Message
Stacy
medicine forum addict


Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Posts: 86

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Natural Health and topical zinc for skin Reply with quote

"Mr-Natural-Health" <johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote in
message news:1122757553.571673.126120@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
| Stacy wrote:
|
| > It is interesting that this individual states on his website
| > ...
| > Blah, ... Blah, ... Blah
|
| Now, back to the topic at hand. Smile
|

Yeah, it was a lot of "blah blah blah" at your website. You try to talk the
talk but don't walk the walk...
Not surprised you want to cover up my post about it. For anyone interested,
see this creatures prior posted responses to people.

Peace & Love to You yet again....
Back to top
Matt Beckwith
medicine forum beginner


Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:47 pm    Post subject: Re: PROMOTING BIRTH CONTROL = LESS ABORTION Reply with quote

<essentialsexinfo3@rock.com> wrote

Quote:
By not promoting
birth control, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies.

This argument would only make sense to people with low IQ's, it seems to me.

If you believe that abortion is murder, then the above statements becomes,
"By not promoting murder, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies."

Those who are against abortion believe it to be murder, so this argument
will convince no one.
Back to top
TC
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 1814

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:13 pm    Post subject: Re: New Autism Cases Level Off in California, Data Show Reply with quote

Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com wrote:
Quote:
SBH

http://www.sumeria.net/health/price.html

http://www.price-pottenger.org/price.htm

"Dr. Price's classic volume, Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, is
available from the Price-Pottenger Nutrition Foundation at
www.ppnf.org. Its photographs illustrate in an unforgettable way the
physical degeneration that occurs when human groups abandon nourishing
traditional diets in favor of modern convenience foods."

Read Price's book and learn about the groups that did live long healthy
lives free of chronic disease. It's an eye opener. Especially for those
who are as ignorant of the simple truth and the commonsense of eating
real food and getting proper nutrition for good health as you obviously
are.

TC


COMMENT:

Give me a frigging break. You want me to read a 1943 book by a dentist
who went around the world to primitive peoples and "couldn't find" any
degenerative disease or heart disease?

No. Do you have problems with the english language? I can write in
French if that would help?

He went and found about a dozen groups of people that did not have
significant amounts of chronic illnesses such as heart disease,
obesity, dental caries, diabetes, Chrohn's & Colitis, etc. Even
infectious disease was rare, diseases like TB.

Quote:
How is a dentist going to find
heart disease in 1943? Does he give tables of ages documented by some
kind of age certification, followed by his own impecable physical
examinations, looking for things like jugular venous distention, S3
heart sounds, crackles at the lung bases on auscultation, and so on?
It's easy to find no evidence of chronic disease if there are no
nursing homes, you know. When people can't take care of themselves,
they die, and so everybody alive is healthy. You see little chronic
disease in wild animals, also-- it's a zoo thing. Slow down and get
eaten, is the motto out there in the natural world.

He dug up skulls with perfect teeth? I've no doubt that a lot of these
people on low sugar diets probably had pretty good teeth in young
adulthood-- I will give him that. But how old these skulls were, nobody
knows. How old any of these people are, nobody knows. He has photos? So
do I. There are a lot of National Geographic photos of toothless elders
among primitives who have little experience with the Western diet.
We've all seen them. Do you think somebody has been doing around doing
the dirty to people with pliers, since Dr. Weston's time?

How about a modern study where somebody's ages are documented, and we
have a little more science than some dentist's stories?

SBH

Find me any modern research or even older research that shows
differently or contrary to what his documented findings were or which
were better documented or more convincing in the real world with
different findings.

BTW, are you financially affiliated in any way with any food or
pharmaceutical company or are you affiliated with an organization that
is?

TC
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Jewchology Reply with quote

Jordan wrote:
Quote:
Jewish Psychology
by VNN Staff

Undoubtedly, there's nothing wrong with the practice of psychology per
se. It has its place in some situations. But there is something wrong
with the use of perverted psychology to debilitate an entire country,
as is happening in America today. The perverted psychology we refer to
can be described as Jewified or Jewish psychology. It is designed to
further the socials aims of the Jews by masquerading as therapy for
gentiles.

Jewish psychology (hereafter Jewchology) appears in our country in
several forms, both in public and in private. Sometimes Jewchology is
found behind the closed door of a psychologist's office, sometimes in
a book or a newspaper, sometimes on a talk-radio show, and sometimes
even on television. But whether the practicers of Jewchology are
actually Jewish, or just gentiles unwittingly serving up a Jewish
dish, it's always the same stew being offered to the public:
victimization (through some newly-discovered 'disorder' or
'syndrome'), leftism, feminism, guilt, egalitarianism, emasculation
and anti-family messages. In other words, what the Jews pioneered in
prior eras is now incorporated into Jewchology.

A key feature of Jewchology is the airing of other peoples' dirty
laundry in public - the way snotty Jewesses do at the bagel shop. In
other words, private matters that shouldn't really be mentioned in
public are discussed openly, ostensibly as a form of 'therapy.'
Television seems to be especially suitable for the airing of private
laundry. It works like this: on a daytime talk-show, a hapless gentile
presents her personal problem to a wise 'expert,' who then proceeds to
use Jewchology to 'solve' the gentile's problem.[1] That involves the
expert spooning up generous helpings of shame, guilt, leftism,
feminism and Freudian psychobaloney.[2] Then, after a few sobs and
some hand-wringing, the 'cured' gentile is then ready to re-enter
society as a productive citizen. Her problem is publicly aired and
convincingly solved with a little Jewish 'magic.' Witless gentiles
across America see the drama unfold on their TV screens and then apply
that 'Jewmagic' to their own problems, thereby weaving the Jewmagic
into the fabric of their communities, in a manner of speaking. Those
communities then become even more Jewified than they were before. Vot
a racket! The experts who practice Jewchology are usually 'pop'
psychologists or advice columnists, or, they may be staffers at some
'institute' in California where leftists munch granola while waxing
nostalgically about the USSR. No matter, all Jewchology experts have
one thing in common: they truly believe in it. It's been sold to them
as legit, and they will never question its viability.

To return to the subject of guilt/Jewchology for a minute: the Jews
claim to be preoccupied with guilt in their personal lives. Whether
they really are, or whether they just want the world to think that
they are, remains unclear. Nonetheless, in their stunted psychology
the Jews are careful to use guilt as a tool. Whites are naturally kind
people and so are the perfect victims for Jewchology guilt-trips.

But regardless of which form of Jewchology is foisted onto the
American public, and regardless of whether the foister is racially
Jewish or not, Jewchology remains good for the Jews. It creates a
unsteady, sickly America, an America teeming with spoiled, feminized
subjects who obsess over movies, TV shows, sex, celebrities, and SUVs
while ignoring important things like race, culture and family. And the
Jews -- very aware of race and culture themselves -- profit from that,
in several different ways.

Furthermore, Jewchology is typical in a sense, because it is yet
another Jewish co-option. The field of psychology was not pioneered by
Jews, but by gentiles such as William James and Wilhelm Wundt.[3] The
Jews have 'stolen' psychology and remanufactured it into a race-weapon
for use against Whites - just as the Jews remanufactured other gentile
creations for that purpose, e.g. America's legal system.

Jewchology isn't traditional psychology. It is instead a sickness
posing as a cure, a social epidemic engineered by the hucksters of
humanity.

VNN STAFF

[1] a humorous-but-accurate example: Gentile: (*sniff*)(*sob*) "My
stepfather is suspicious of Black people....h-he avoids Black
neighborhoods at night." (*studio audience oooooos*) Expert: "You need
to approach your stepfather and tell him that racism is always wrong,
unless practiced by a rabbi. Can you do that?" Gentile: "I...I think
so...(*sob*) (*sniff*) I'll t-t-try...I'll really t-try..." (*studio
audience applauds*)(*host offers Gentile a tissue*).

[2] Freud was Jewish, as are many modern, popular psychologists.

[3] psychology should not be confused with Sigmund Freud's
psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis is considered to be illegitimate by
many professionals. Freud is widely referred to as "Sigmund Fraud."

A good read.

John
Back to top
jabara
medicine forum beginner


Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 6:26 am    Post subject: Re: Jewchology Reply with quote

<johnwesley55@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1122771217.222288.26590@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Quote:

Jordan wrote:
Jewish Psychology
by VNN Staff

Undoubtedly, there's nothing wrong with the practice of psychology per
se. It has its place in some situations. But there is something wrong
with the use of perverted psychology to debilitate an entire country,
as is happening in America today. The perverted psychology we refer to
can be described as Jewified or Jewish psychology. It is designed to
further the socials aims of the Jews by masquerading as therapy for
gentiles.


Not "gentiles", "genitals", Jews were always talking to their shmekels.
Back to top
Happy Dog
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 336

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:33 am    Post subject: Re: New Autism Cases Level Off in California, Data Show Reply with quote

"TC" <tunderbar@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1122768824.842954.
Quote:
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com wrote:
Give me a frigging break. You want me to read a 1943 book by a dentist
who went around the world to primitive peoples and "couldn't find" any
degenerative disease or heart disease?

No. Do you have problems with the english language? I can write in
French if that would help?

He went and found about a dozen groups of people that did not have
significant amounts of chronic illnesses such as heart disease,
obesity, dental caries, diabetes, Chrohn's & Colitis, etc. Even
infectious disease was rare, diseases like TB.

He couldn't tell if they has many of these diseases. Did you miss this?


moo
Back to top
Sylvia Else
medicine forum beginner


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:49 am    Post subject: Re: PROMOTING BIRTH CONTROL = LESS ABORTION Reply with quote

Matt Beckwith wrote:

Quote:
essentialsexinfo3@rock.com> wrote


By not promoting
birth control, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies.


This argument would only make sense to people with low IQ's, it seems to me.

If you believe that abortion is murder, then the above statements becomes,
"By not promoting murder, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies."

Those who are against abortion believe it to be murder, so this argument
will convince no one.



Run that past me again. Start with

"By not promoting birth control, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies."

Now, it's the unplanned pregancies that lead to abortions, not the birth
control. So substituting "abortion" for "unplanned pregnancies" we get:

"By not promoting birth control, you're choosing abortions."

Now substitute "murder" for "abortions", and we get:

"By not promoting birth control, you're choosing murder."

This is rather different from your claimed result of

"By not promoting murder, you're choosing unplanned pregnancies."

What was that about a low IQ?

Sylvia.
Back to top
Bryan Olson
medicine forum beginner


Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:52 am    Post subject: Re: Smithsonian Expert Buried - FREAK ACCIDENT.. Reply with quote

Ed's bitter that his fossils turned out to be
ordinary rocks. Same thing happened to me, when I
was seven.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/mh121784.gif

--Bryan


Ed Conrad lied:
Quote:
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Rueters)
-- Funeral services were held
Saturday for a longtime expert at
the Smithsonian Insititution
who suffocated earlier this week
in a freak accident while searching
for answers to man's origin and
ancestry.
A Smithsonian officia said Chris
Krolczyk had to be buried in a 4-by-4-
foot casket because morticians were
unable to remove his head from his
rectum.
Krolyczk had inadvertently used
Crazy Glue instead of Vasoline and
was unable to remove his head.

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/sunshine.jpg

MORE - MORE - MORE

Spam, spam, spam
Back to top
Just Taylor
medicine forum beginner


Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:38 pm    Post subject: Re: A reminder for brad jesness Reply with quote

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:37:51 GMT, "Card XII" <dlrodgers@frontiers.net>
wrote:

Quote:
Just to help you remember, brad, that there are archives, and also to remind
you how powerless you are, here's one of your 2002 posts:

You really hit the nail on the coffin here... this is what bothers Brad
the most. That he is totally exposed for the powerless, dickless coward
that he is.

He may at one time been able to intimidate people but that has long
since past. Nobody is scared of Brad Jesness, nobody cares about him.
The fact that he is totally powerless and can never do anything to
anyone on Usenet is just icing on the cake when it comes to hosting his
FAQ...


Quote:
"Anonymous" <nobody@paranoici.org> wrote in message
news:7ba319981d766189388eae732f142619@paranoici.org...
From: Brad (00003483@no-id.com)
Subject: Legal Woes for 'Dr.' Dan Rogers
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Date: 2002-03-21 11:14:26 PST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Contrary to what the libelous/slanderous/defamatory liar, 'Dr.' Dan
Rogers says, IT IS NECESSARY FOR _HIM_ TO HAVE REASONABLE EVIDENCE OF
CHARGES MADE PUBLICLY AGAINST ANOTHER PERSON. I need not prove
that false groundless charges are groundless OR that other falsehoods
are falsehoods (though I _have_ done so in some cases).
Perhaps Dan Rogers should take some of his spare time to look
into the law. Also:

If I file (or have filed) a complaint with any officials in good
faith,
I have no problems.
I can show that there are at least 10 lies you made for which there
is NO reasonable evidence and some for which there is evidence
to the contrary. I can also show beyond doubt that you have been
informed of the false nature of many of the charges and are KNOWINGLY
engaging in MALICIOUS DEFAMATION. And, Dan, you are KNOWINGLY
ENGAGING IN
BEHAVIOR TO DO PERSONAL HARM. YOU ARE AN UNETHICAL PSYCHOLOGIST.
ALL IN YOUR FIELD WISH YOU WOULD DISAPPEAR, IN MY VIEW.

(All this is beside the point that you, Dan, are an extreme hypocrite
- --
a man who helped start a moderated newsgroup TO GET RID OF PERSONAL
ATTACKS. PERSONAL ATTACKS IS ALL YOU HAVE, DAN ROGERS. THAT
IS ALL YOU HAVE AGAINST THE FACTS. YOU AND THE OTHER PSYCHOLOGY
LEADERS USE PERSONAL ATTACKS CONSTANTLY, EITHER YOURSELF OR
THROUGH YOUR HOODLUM PROXIES.)

ON A MATTER, USEFUL FOR ALL:

For important information on the psychotherapy field, I urge
readers to see my web page:

http://www.concentric.net/~cyberper/it.html

(no personal attacks against anyone there; no people from Usenet
are even mentioned on the web page.)


Here's the rub for you, moron, or one of many rubs: When you accuse me of
lying, it actually is, really is, up to you to prove that what I said is a
lie. Here's the legal requirement, simplified for somebody like you:

You, the person who charges that I lied, have to 1) prove that it is a lie,
and 2) prove that I knew it is a lie.

Contrary to what you thought, and still believe, I do not have any burden of
proof to show that I told the truth.

Really galls you, doesn't it brad. Your only defense is always the same:
nobody has posted anything that proves, to your satisfaction, that you have
committed any wrong. And of course, nothing ever proves anything to your
satisfaction.

But there is nobody on usenet who believes you anyway. Nobody! Not even
GiGi, Linda, Hoofie, Bullis, Stripkitty: NOBODY BELIEVES YOU!!

You keep making statements as if you have an audience. Fool!
You have a laughing gallery, not an audience. Nobody believes you. Not
even your wife. Not even a child believes you. You don't have a child who
believes you, do you?

But you keep making claims as if somebody listens to you. Every board,
organization, individual, police department, you have complained to, they
have dissed you every time. They know your lies, and your lies are archived
and on CD. Live with it, moron.

Card XII




--
Taylor

Hammer of Thor, September 2002
Back to top
Twittering One
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 523

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:46 pm    Post subject: Runner's knee Reply with quote

"Ice cream, Nancy............lots of ice cream."
~ Miss High Con

!BEWARE!

Sign
Says ~

~ * ~
_________________________________________
~ * ~ A Sign, A Boarded Shingle
Hung Out TO Dry ~ * ~

! * ! Strung Out, Full Spectrum, Solar
Powered Luminescence ~ !
_________________________________________
~ * Rope Lights & Emerald
Greens ~

New Technology Save Hundreds Energy
Quality, Beauty, Durability, Price ~ !

String, a theory, links emerald green putting links
Down an alley of spruce, cedar, redwood, sinks
A Pinecone Hole in One,
At The Olmstead Country Clube ~

!Ka ~ Plunk ~ !

www.1000Bulbs.com

Or goggle over 1000 tulip bulbs
Blooming daffy daffodils ...

Bring Doggles, too ~ !
~ * ~ ~ ~
_________________________________________
Yes ~
A Morning Wood Roadside Semi ~ OTIC
_________________________________________
* Dogging Arts * Fogging Minds * It's a Star *
_________________________________________
*
~ * ~
Blog, I'll warrant ye, or dog? Who knows. Pass the grog!
But if ye see me lost pup, please bring that scurvy dog home!
I got Leon a brand-new bone, with a chest full a' booty.
_________________
http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo
*
Back to top
Twittering One
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 523

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:51 pm    Post subject: Re: A reminder for brad jesness Reply with quote

Taylor,
You know Jeff Taylor, from Pensacola?
Back to top
Just Taylor
medicine forum beginner


Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:53 pm    Post subject: Re: A reminder for brad jesness Reply with quote

On 31 Jul 2005 08:51:44 -0700, "Twittering One" <twitteringone@aol.com>
wrote:

Quote:
Taylor,
You know Jeff Taylor, from Pensacola?

He's the brother-in-law to Steve Burnett, why?


--
Taylor

Hammer of Thor, September 2002
Back to top
Twittering One
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 523

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:58 pm    Post subject: Re: A reminder for brad jesness Reply with quote

Hey ~ !
Back to top
Body Snatcher
medicine forum beginner


Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:57 pm    Post subject: Re: A reminder for brad jesness Reply with quote

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:38:20 -0700, Just Taylor wrote:

Quote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:37:51 GMT, "Card XII" <dlrodgers@frontiers.net
wrote:

Just to help you remember, brad, that there are archives, and also to remind
you how powerless you are, here's one of your 2002 posts:

You really hit the nail on the coffin here... this is what bothers Brad
the most. That he is totally exposed for the powerless, dickless coward
that he is.

HAY! I just have to say this first, and Brad lost his dick on this day 9
years ago.

It aint healed I say. He mussen be picking the scabs. :(


Quote:
He may at one time been able to intimidate people but that has long
since past. Nobody is scared of Brad Jesness, nobody cares about him.
The fact that he is totally powerless and can never do anything to
anyone on Usenet is just icing on the cake when it comes to hosting his
FAQ...


"Anonymous" <nobody@paranoici.org> wrote in message
news:7ba319981d766189388eae732f142619@paranoici.org...
From: Brad (00003483@no-id.com)
Subject: Legal Woes for 'Dr.' Dan Rogers
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Date: 2002-03-21 11:14:26 PST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Contrary to what the libelous/slanderous/defamatory liar, 'Dr.' Dan
Rogers says, IT IS NECESSARY FOR _HIM_ TO HAVE REASONABLE EVIDENCE OF
CHARGES MADE PUBLICLY AGAINST ANOTHER PERSON. I need not prove
that false groundless charges are groundless OR that other falsehoods
are falsehoods (though I _have_ done so in some cases).
Perhaps Dan Rogers should take some of his spare time to look
into the law. Also:

If I file (or have filed) a complaint with any officials in good
faith,
I have no problems.
I can show that there are at least 10 lies you made for which there
is NO reasonable evidence and some for which there is evidence
to the contrary. I can also show beyond doubt that you have been
informed of the false nature of many of the charges and are KNOWINGLY
engaging in MALICIOUS DEFAMATION. And, Dan, you are KNOWINGLY
ENGAGING IN
BEHAVIOR TO DO PERSONAL HARM. YOU ARE AN UNETHICAL PSYCHOLOGIST.
ALL IN YOUR FIELD WISH YOU WOULD DISAPPEAR, IN MY VIEW.

(All this is beside the point that you, Dan, are an extreme hypocrite
- --
a man who helped start a moderated newsgroup TO GET RID OF PERSONAL
ATTACKS. PERSONAL ATTACKS IS ALL YOU HAVE, DAN ROGERS. THAT
IS ALL YOU HAVE AGAINST THE FACTS. YOU AND THE OTHER PSYCHOLOGY
LEADERS USE PERSONAL ATTACKS CONSTANTLY, EITHER YOURSELF OR
THROUGH YOUR HOODLUM PROXIES.)

ON A MATTER, USEFUL FOR ALL:

For important information on the psychotherapy field, I urge
readers to see my web page:

http://www.concentric.net/~cyberper/it.html

(no personal attacks against anyone there; no people from Usenet
are even mentioned on the web page.)


Here's the rub for you, moron, or one of many rubs: When you accuse me of
lying, it actually is, really is, up to you to prove that what I said is a
lie. Here's the legal requirement, simplified for somebody like you:

You, the person who charges that I lied, have to 1) prove that it is a lie,
and 2) prove that I knew it is a lie.

Contrary to what you thought, and still believe, I do not have any burden of
proof to show that I told the truth.

Really galls you, doesn't it brad. Your only defense is always the same:
nobody has posted anything that proves, to your satisfaction, that you have
committed any wrong. And of course, nothing ever proves anything to your
satisfaction.

But there is nobody on usenet who believes you anyway. Nobody! Not even
GiGi, Linda, Hoofie, Bullis, Stripkitty: NOBODY BELIEVES YOU!!

You keep making statements as if you have an audience. Fool!
You have a laughing gallery, not an audience. Nobody believes you. Not
even your wife. Not even a child believes you. You don't have a child who
believes you, do you?

But you keep making claims as if somebody listens to you. Every board,
organization, individual, police department, you have complained to, they
have dissed you every time. They know your lies, and your lies are archived
and on CD. Live with it, moron.

Card XII

Back to top
Jeff
medicine forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1313

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:28 pm    Post subject: Re: AMERICANS MORE AWARE OF WHAT THEY EAT Reply with quote

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:42EB5E26.84360CBC@heartmdphd.com...
Quote:
Jeff wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:42EACE89.95E48042@heartmdphd.com...
Jeff wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:42E9FCC9.1C4517B8@heartmdphd.com...
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

STUDY: AMERICANS MORE AWARE OF WHAT THEY EAT
[From the VNU Foodservice Network]

PORT WASHINGTON, NY -- [From the VNU Foodservice Network, October
25,
2004] -- Is the tide turning on the country's seemingly endless
round
of
weight gain? Are Americans finally learning to control their
calorie
intake and find more balance in their eating patterns? Could be,
says
a
new study by The NPD Group.

According to NPD's 19th Annual Report on Eating Patterns in
America,
diners are becoming more calorie-conscious, and as a group are no
longer
gaining weight. They've put the brakes on snacking, and also on
restaurant takeout meals. The bad news: They're eating less at
restaurants overall.

Then the title of the article should be changed to:

"Americans more aware of **how much** they are eating."

Sounds like you, Don, Jeff et al now have your proof that a sizeable
number of folks here in the U.S. are using the 2PD-OMER Approach.

No, it sounds like people are not gaining by adopting better diets.

"Eating less" is a WOE rather than a diet. Note that the "VNU
foodservice network" call this "bad news."

I don't care about the VNU foodservice network, whatever that is.

It is clear they speak for the foodservice industry in expressing their
opinion that people eating less is "bad news."

It would be wise to discern that these folks (Bob Pastorio included)
would keep you brainwashed that "eating right and exercising" are the
keys to losing weight permanently.

The true keys to losing weight permanently are:

(1) Weighing your meals.

(2) Eating less than 2 lbs (32 ounces) per day.

... while recognizing the foodservice industry's motivation for
rebrainwashing you into making your healthy appetite (aka hunger) your
foe (befriending hunger is the **third** key).

These three (3) keys define the 2PD-OMER Approach which is a WOE that
forsakes calorie counting:

The problem is that it is not the weight of the food that matters, but the
number of calories you eat.

You are a total jerk if you think otherwise.

Jeff

Quote:
http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/wtloss.asp

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/press.asp

You may hear me speak about the 2PD-OMER Approach in person and meet
others who have been using this WOE here:

http://www.TheHealthFair.com

You may also choose to have me speak to your group or organization about
the 2PD-OMER Approach in person for the usual and customary speaker's
fee of US$30,000.00 made as a tax-deductible contribution to
TheWellnessFoundation.com (it remains my choice to not profit personally
from the 2PD-OMER Approach):

http://www.TheWellnessFoundation.com

In Christ's love and service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist

**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?G1D5217EA
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?W13A4250B
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 141 of 143 [2136 Posts] Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, ..., 139, 140, 141, 142, 143 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Oct 19, 2018 12:44 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Medicine forums » General talk
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Atropine questions acemanvx@yahoo.com vision 15 Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:33 am
No new posts The return of orthoK and some questions and answers acemanvx@yahoo.com vision 0 Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:33 am
No new posts Have questions John the Baptist Jr. dentistry 1 Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:23 am
No new posts Post implant surgery questions JimSocal dentistry 0 Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:50 am
No new posts Questions about few odd Conditions? Kumar cardiology 0 Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:35 am

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: email marketing campaigns , electronics forum, Science forum, Unix/Linux blog, Unix/Linux documentation, Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0357s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0132s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]